Jane Doe #1 et al v. Boulder Valley School District No. RE-2 et al

Filing 48

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 46 Plaintiffs' Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Scheduling/Planning Conference failure to state a date certain as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1D. By Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 11/28/11.(mnfsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02107-PAB-KLM JANE DOE #1, JANE DOE #2, and JANE DOE #3, Plaintiffs, v. BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. RE-2, BOARD OF EDUCATION OF BOULDER VALLEY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. RE-2, TRAVIS JON MASSE, in his individual capacity, CHRIS KING, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Superintendent, GINGER RAMSEY, in her individual capacity and in her official capacity as Principal, MIKE LOWE, in his individual capacity and in his official capacity as Assistant Principal and Athletic Director, MARK SCHMIDT, in his individual capacity, MATT SCHMIDT, in his individual capacity, JASON WANEKA, in his individual capacity, and JASMINE MASSE, in her individual capacity, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion to Reschedule Scheduling/Planning Conference [Docket No. 46; Filed November 28, 2011] (the “Motion”). IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to state a date certain as required by D.C.COLO.LCivR 6.1D. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, to the extent that the parties are seeking to stay the litigation pending resolution of the motion to dismiss [#44], they shall file a motion to stay and include legal authority for their request. Dated: November 28, 2011

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?