Raw Films, Ltd. v. John Does 1-24
Filing
41
ORDER re: 40 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of Does 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24 only 40 filed January 12, 2012, is APPROVED; That plaintiffs claim against defendants, John Does 1, 3, 5-22 and 24, are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and That defendants, John Does 1, 3, 5-22 and 24, are DROPPED as named parties to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 1/12/2012. (ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-02162-REB-MJW
RAW FILMS, LTD,
Plaintiff,
v.
JOHN DOES 1, 3, and 5-24,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO
DEFENDANTS DOES 1, 3, 5-22, AND 24 ONLY
Blackburn, J.
The matter is before me on the Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
Without Prejudice of Does 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20,
21, 22, and 24 only [#40]1 filed January 12, 2012. After reviewing the notice and the
file, I conclude that the notice should be approved and that plaintiff’s claims against
defendants, John Does 1, 3, 5-22 and 24, should be dismissed without prejudice.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Plaintiff’s Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice of
Does 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, and 24 only
[#40] filed January 12, 2012, is APPROVED;
2. That plaintiff’s claim against defendants, John Does 1, 3, 5-22 and 24, are
DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; and
1
“[#40]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific
paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention
throughout this order.
3. That defendants, John Does 1, 3, 5-22 and 24, are DROPPED as named
parties to this action, and the case caption is amended accordingly.
Dated January 12, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?