Kessling et al v. Barker et al
Filing
48
ORDER adopting 45 Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge. The Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Kessling From This Case [# 41 ] filed1/8/2013, by plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, is GRANTED. Under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), the claims of plaintiff, Marjorie A. Kessling, are DISMISSED. Plaintiff, Marjorie A. Kessling, is DROPPED as a party to this case, andthe caption shall be AMENDED accordingly. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 9/18/2013.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-02192-REB-CBS
MARJORIE A. KESSLING, and
TRENTON H. PARKER,
Plaintiffs,
v.
BETHANY SALZMAN, individually and in her official capacity, and
GARY SCHWARTZ, individually and his official capacity,
Defendants.
ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Blackburn, J.
This matter is before me on the following: (1) plaintiff Trenton H. Parker’s Motion
To Dismiss Plaintiff Kessling From This Case [#41]1 filed January 8, 2013; and (2)
the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] filed January 16,
2013. I approve and adopt the recommendation and grant the motion to dismiss plaintiff
Marjorie Kessling.
The plaintiffs are acting pro se. Therefore, I construe their filings generously and
with the leniency due pro se litigants, see Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94, 127 S.
Ct. 2197, 2200, 167 L.Ed.2d 1081 (2007); Andrews v. Heaton, 483 F.3d 1070, 1076
(10th Cir. 2007); Hall v. Belmon, 935 F.2d 1106, 1110 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Haines v.
Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21 (1972)).
1
“[#41]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
Because no party filed an objection to the recommendation, I review it only for
plain error. See Morales-Fernandez v. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 418
F.3d 1116, 1122 (10th Cir. 2005).2 Finding no error, much less plain error, I find and
conclude that the recommendation should be approved and adopted as an order of this
court.
As noted by the magistrate judge, the motion to dismiss plaintiff, Marjorie
Kessling, was filed by her co-plaintiff, Trenton Parker. Ms. Kessling appeared at a
scheduling conference and asked that she be dismissed from this case. No party has
objected to the dismissal of Ms. Kessling from this case.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [#45] filed
January 16, 2013, is APPROVED and ADOPTED as an order of this court;
2. That the Motion To Dismiss Plaintiff Kessling From This Case [#41] filed
January 8, 2013, by plaintiff, Trenton H. Parker, is GRANTED;
3. That under FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(2), the claims of plaintiff, Marjorie A.
Kessling, are DISMISSED; and
4. That plaintiff, Marjorie A. Kessling, is DROPPED as a party to this case, and
the caption shall be AMENDED accordingly.
Dated September 18, 2013, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
2
This standard pertains even though plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this matter. MoralesFernandez, 418 F.3d at 1122.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?