Baker et al v. Thomson et al

Filing 32

MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Telephonic Status Conference held on 5/1/2012. Counsel for the plaintiff shall speak with her client to see how he wants to proceed. If he wants to move forward with the w rongful death claim the motion will be ruled on. If a settlement is desired then the plaintiff's 25 MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify 2 Complaint should be withdrawn. The parties shall move forward with exchanging offers and contact the court if a settlement conference is needed. The plaintiff's 29 First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Expert Disclosurs [sic] is DENIED without prejudice. (FTR: Robin Mason) (cbscd, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer
Civil Action No.: 11-cv-02219-LTB-CBS
Date: May 1, 2012

FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402
Courtroom Deputy: Robin Mason

Parties:

Counsel:

ELVIS BAKER, et al.,

Erica A. Vecchio

Plaintiffs,

v.
DAVID THOMSON, et al.,

Andrew Keith Lavin
William A. Rogers , III

Defendants.

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
HEARING: TELEPHONIC STATUS CONFERENCE
Court in Session:
9:17 a.m.
Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
Discussion regarding where the parties are at with respect to engaging in settlement talks and
setting a settlement conference. Mr. Rogers discusses unresolved factors that may impact the
parties ability to reach a settlement: Mrs. Doris Baker’s passing, Mrs. Baker’s claims being
dismissed, and the filing of a wrongful death claim (want to amend the complaint to include this
claim).
The court advises the parties that the plaintiff’s MOTION to Amend/Correct/Modify #2
Complaint (Docket No. 25, field on 4/2/2012) has not referred to Magistrate Judge Shaffer but he
has reviewed it. The court advises that this motion, in its current form, should be withdrawn.
The court also reminds the parties that the Local Rules need to be adhered to when filing
motions. This motion was filed on April 2, 2012 but the deadline for amendment of pleadings
and/or joinder of parties was November 30, 2011. The court advises that first good cause would
need to be shown according to Rule 16(b) before the court can extend this deadline to allow a

motion seeking leave to amend (in accordance with Rule 15(a)). Discussion regarding the letter
from Dr. Michael Martine. Ms. Vecchio advises that she would be happy to file a new motion to
amend and attempt to get more information from Dr. Michael Martino.
The court addresses the parties regarding moving forward in an attempt to reach a settlement in
this case pertaining to both named plaintiffs.
ORDERED: Counsel for the plaintiff shall speak with her client to see how he wants to
proceed. If he wants to move forward with the wrongful death claim the motion
will be ruled on. If a settlement is desired then the plaintiff’s MOTION to
Amend/Correct/Modify #2 Complaint (Docket No. 25, field on 4/2/2012) should
be withdrawn. The parties shall move forward with exchanging offers and
contact the court if a settlement conference is needed.
Discussion regarding the plaintiff’s First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Expert
Disclosurs [sic] (Docket No. 29, filed on 4/24/2012) and Rule 26(a)(2).
ORDERED: The plaintiff's First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Expert Disclosurs
[sic] (Docket No. 29, filed on 4/24/2012) is DENIED without prejudice.
Discussion between the court and Mr. Rogers regarding Mrs. Baker’s claims and Rule 25. The
parties may file a stipulation motion to dismiss her claims and amend the case caption. The
court advises that it cannot dismiss anything right now according to Rule 636(b).
HEARING CONCLUDED.
Court in recess:
Total time in court:

9:53 a.m.
00:36

To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at
[phone] or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.