Adams County, Board of County Commissioners v. Asay et al
Filing
29
Minute ORDER denying without prejudice 25 Motion to Suspend the Proceedings, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 10/25/11.(lyg, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02238-PAB-KLM
ADAMS COUNTY, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,
Plaintiff,
v.
LELAND ASAY,
SAMUEL VIDAL GOMEZ,
STACEY LYNN PARKIN, f/k/a Stacey Lynn Spera,
JERRY LEE RHEA,
DENNIS GLENN COEN,
HEATH ALLEN RUSSO,
LOUIE GEORGE SCHIMPF,
QUALITY PAVING CO., a Colorado corporation, and
QUALITY RESURFACING CO., a Colorado corporation,
Defendants.
_____________________________________________________________________
MINUTE ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Samuel Vidal Gomez’s (“Gomez”)
Motion to Suspend the Proceedings [Docket No. 25; Filed October 21, 2011] (the
“Motion”). Defendant Gomez proceeds in this matter pro se.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
Defendant Gomez’s failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1A., which provides as
follows:
The Court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before
filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good faith efforts to
confer with opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter.
The moving party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule.
The Motion is subject to denial on this basis alone. The Motion is further subject to denial
-1-
for Defendant Gomez’s failure to comply with D.C.COLO.LCivR 10.1E., which prescribes
that “[a]ll papers shall be double-spaced.” If he so chooses, Defendant Gomez may refile
his Motion after complying fully with the Local Rules.
Dated: October 25, 2011
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?