Center for Legal Advocacy v. Bicha et al

Filing 35

ORDER : Supplemental Settlement Conference set for 1/30/2012 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/5/12. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY, d/b/a The Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People, Plaintiff, v. REGGIE BICHA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of Human Services, and TERESA A. BERNAL, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ IT IS ORDERED: (1) A supplemental settlement conference will be held on January 30, 2012, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th Street, Denver, Colorado. All settlement conferences that take place before the magistrate judge shall be confidential. Pro se parties, attorneys, and client representatives with full authority to settle the case must be present at the settlement conference in person. (NOTE: This requirement is not fulfilled by the presence of counsel alone. If an insurance company is involved, an adjustor authorized to enter into settlement must also be present.) (2) Representatives of the Office of the State Court Administrator and of the Association of County Sheriffs of Colorado are directed to attend the supplemental settlement conference. The defendants shall contact the State Court Administrator and the Sheriffs Association and inform them of this requirement. Dated January 5, 2012. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?