Center for Legal Advocacy v. Bicha et al
ORDER : Second Supplemental Settlement Conference set for 2/27/2012 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland, by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 1/30/12. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02285-MSK-BNB
CENTER FOR LEGAL ADVOCACY,
d/b/a The Legal Center for People With Disabilities and Older People,
REGGIE BICHA, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Colorado Department of
Human Services, and
TERESA A. BERNAL, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of the Colorado Mental
Health Institute at Pueblo,
IT IS ORDERED:
A second supplemental settlement conference will be held on February 27, 2012,
at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 401, 4th floor, Alfred A. Arraj United States Courthouse, 901 19th
Street, Denver, Colorado. All settlement conferences that take place before the magistrate judge
shall be confidential. Pro se parties, attorneys, and client representatives with full authority to
settle the case must be present at the settlement conference in person or by telephone. Anyone
planning to attend the conference by telephone must contact my chambers on or before
February 20, 2012, to make all necessary arrangements;
Representatives for the defendants authorized to discuss the plaintiff’s demand
for attorneys fees must be present at the conference in person; and
On or before February 6, 2012, the plaintiff shall serve on defendants’ counsel a
written demand for attorneys fees, including contemporaneous time records (redacted or edited
to protect issues of privilege and trial strategy, if necessary); evidence establishing that the
hourly rate claimed is reasonable; a summary of the attorneys’ qualifications and experience; and
the total amount claimed, including a description of its basis.
Dated January 30, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?