United States of America v. Welch et al
Filing
9
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AND MOTION TO STRIKE/DISMISS. Defendant's 7 Motion for More Definite Statement is denied. Defendant's 8 Motion to Strike/Dismiss is denied. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 11/1/11.(mnfsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Christine M. Arguello
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02292-CMA-KLM
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAMES D. WELCH,
AMRA WELCH, as nominee/alter ego of James D. Welch,
JAMES D. WELCH, as Executive Trustee of Celestial Pursuits Trust,
CIT GROUP/EQUIPMENT FINANCING, INC., and
COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
Defendants.
ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT
AND MOTION TO STRIKE/DISMISS
Before the Court are Defendant Welch’s Motion for a More Definite Statement
(Doc. # 7) and Motion to Strike/Dismiss (Doc. # 8). Upon review of these motions and
the case file, the Court finds as follows:
Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite Statement (Doc. # 7) is without merit.
Such motions are proper where the plaintiff’s pleading is “so vague or ambiguous that
the party cannot reasonably prepare a response.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). Here, the
Court determines that the Government’s Complaint (Doc. # 1) puts forward “specific,
nonconclusory factual allegations,” Crawford-El v. Britton, 523 U.S. 574. 598 (1998),
which are neither vague nor ambiguous. Thus, Defendant’s Motion for a More Definite
Statement (Doc. # 7) is DENIED.
Similarly, Defendant’s Motion to Strike/Dismiss (Doc. # 8) is also unavailing.
Defendant cites Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 129 S. Ct. 1937, 1949 (2009), but fails to argue
convincingly that the Government has not “state[d] a claim to relief that is plausible on
its face.” Having reviewed the Complaint (Doc. # 1) and Defendant’s Motion, the Court
is unable to discern any pleading deficiencies under Fed. R. Civ. P. 8 or Iqbal.
Accordingly, Defendant’s Motion to Strike/Dismiss (Doc. # 8) is DENIED.
DATED: November
01 , 2011
BY THE COURT:
_______________________________
CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?