Frederick v. Hartford Underwriters Insurance Company

Filing 61

MINUTE ORDER Denying as moot 55 Plaintiffs Motion to Stay, by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 4/5/2013.(ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02306-WJM-KLM LARRY D. FREDERICK, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD UNDERWRITERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff’s Motion For Stay [Docket No. 55; Filed December 17, 2012] (the “Motion”). Plaintiff filed an Opposition to Motion For Stay on December 27, 2012 [Docket No. 57]. Defendant filed a Reply in Support of Plaintiff’s Motion For Stay on January 7, 2013 [Docket No. 58]. This matter is also before the Court on Defendant’s Notice of U.S. Supreme Court Decision Mooting Plaintiff’s Motion for Stay [Docket No. 60; Filed March 19, 2013] (the “Notice”). The basis for Plaintiff’s Motion was a pending United States Supreme Court case, Standard Fire Insurance Co. v. Knowles, 2013 WL 1104735 (March 19, 2013). Motion at 1. Defendant argues the United States Supreme Court decision entered March 19, 2013 renders Plaintiff’s Motion [#55] moot.1 Since Plaintiff’s Motion requested a stay “pending the issuance of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Knowles v. Standard Fire Insurance Company,” and that decision has issued, the Motion is moot. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion to Stay [#55] is DENIED as moot. Dated: April 5, 2013 1 Defendant opposes the Motion to Stay. See Hartford’s Opp. [#57].

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?