Sampson Construction Co., Inc. v. Quality Electric, Inc.
ORDER granting 12 Motion for Entry of Default Judgment, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 05/25/2012.(wjcsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-02329-REB-CBS
SAMPSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., a Nebraska corporation,
QUALITY ELECTRIC, INC., a Colorado corporation,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT
The matter before me is Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Default Judgment
[#12]1 filed February 28, 2012. I grant the motion.
I have jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (diversity of
citizenship). Plaintiff duly served defendant, Quality Electric, Inc., in accordance with
Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(h)(1). (See [#5] filed September 27, 2011.) Defendant failed to
answer or otherwise respond within the time permitted by law, and thus has admitted
the factual allegations of the complaint other than those relating to damages. See FED.
R. CIV. P. 8(d); see also Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. Huddleston, 94 F.3d
1413, 1415 (10th Cir. 1996); 10A Charles Alan Wright, Arthur R. Miller & Mary Kay Kane,
Federal Practice and Procedure § 2688 at 58-59 (3rd ed. 1998).
“[#12]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff, as general contractor, subcontracted with
defendant for electrical work to be performed on a contract which plaintiff had been
awarded by the United States Departments of the Army and the Air Force. While
plaintiff substantially performed its obligations, defendant materially breached the
contract by failing to perform certain specifications of the contract in a workmanlike
manner and by abandoning the project prior to completion. In addition, defendant failed
to pay for all materials furnished and all work and labor performed in connection with
and as required by the subcontract. The subcontract includes an indemnification
provision entitling plaintiff all costs, damages, and expenses incurred in the event of a
material breach. In addition, by virtue of its default, defendant admits that it made
representations to plaintiff in order to induce it to enter into the contract without benefit
of performance or payment bonds.
Plaintiff thus brought claims for breach of contract, indemnification, and negligent
misrepresentation against defendant. The averments of fact in the complaint are
sufficient to establish the elements of a breach of contract claim under Colorado law,
that is, the existence of a contract, performance by plaintiff, failure to perform by
defendant, and resulting damages to plaintiff. Western Distributing Co. v. Diodosio,
841 P.2d 1053, 1058 (Colo. 1992). In addition, the provisions of the contract itself are
sufficient to support the indemnity claim. See Boulder Plaza Residential, LLC v.
Summit Flooring, LLC, 198 P.3d 1217, 1221 (Colo. App. 2008) ( “An indemnity
agreement is subject to the same rules of construction that govern contracts generally.”)
(citation and internal quotation marks omitted).
With respect to the amount of damages, plaintiff acknowledges that its damages
are the same under any of its three claims. “In a breach of contract action, the objective
is to place the injured party in the position it would have been in but for the breach.”
Kaiser v. Market Square Discount Liquors, Inc., 992 P.2d 636, 640 (Colo. App.
1999). Plaintiff here seeks damages in the form of the amount paid to complete
defendant’s contract work plus the amount paid to defendant’s employees,
subcontractors, and suppliers who were not paid for work performed by defendant, less
the positive subcontract balance which existed at the time of defendant’s abandonment
of the project. As shown by the affidavit appended to plaintiff’s motion, that amount
totals $616,660.42. (Motion App., Exh. A ¶¶ 3-10 at 2-3.) I find and conclude that
plaintiff is entitled to this amount as damages, plus post-judgment interest as allowed by
law, for defendant’s breach of contract pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 55(b)(1).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That Plaintiff’s Second Motion for Default Judgment [#12] filed February
28, 2012, is GRANTED;
2. That default judgment SHALL ENTER on behalf of plaintiff Sampson
Construction Co, Inc., a Nebraska corporation, against defendant Quality Electric, Inc.,
a Colorado corporation, as to plaintiff’s claim for damages for breach of contract;
provided, that the judgment shall be with prejudice;
3. That plaintiff is AWARDED damages against defendant in the amount of
4. That plaintiff is AWARDED post-judgment interest as provided by 28 U.S.C.
§ 1961, on the principal amount set forth in paragraph 3 above, from the date of this
order until the judgment is paid in full; and
5. That plaintiff is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the Clerk of the Court
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated May 25, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?