McConnell v. Cirbo et al

Filing 31

ORDER ACCEPTED 22 Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mixs January 25, 2012 Report and Recommendations. Plaintiffs claims against K. OBrien are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; 3. The Clerk shall AMEND the caption to reflect that Defendant K. OBrien has been terminated; and 4. All future filings should omit K. OBrien as a Defendant, by Judge William J. Martinez on 3/16/2012.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02342-WJM-KLM
FRANKIE L. MCCONNELL,
Plaintiff,
v.
ANDREA CIRBO,
DEBRA REILLY, and
K. O’BRIEN
Defendants.

ORDER ADOPTING RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSING CLAIMS
AGAINST K. O’BRIEN WITHOUT PREJUDICE

This matter is before the Court on the January 25, 2012 Recommendation by
United States Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix that Plaintiff’s claims against Defendant
K. O’Brien be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and 41(b).
(ECF No. 22.) The Recommendation is incorporated herein by reference. See 28
U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Recommendation advised the parties that specific written objections were
due within fourteen days after being served with a copy of the Recommendation. (ECF
No. 22 at 3.) Within that fourteen day period, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Clarify stating
that he did not understand what he needed to file and asking the Court to appoint him
counsel for assistance. (ECF No. 26.) Magistrate Judge Mix denied Plaintiff’s request
for counsel but provided Plaintiff with some guidance as to what certain legal terms in

the Recommendation meant. (ECF No. 28.) Magistrate Judge Mix also extended
Plaintiff’s deadline for filing objections until February 21, 2012. (Id.) Despite this
extension and the clarification provided by Magistrate Judge Mix, Plaintiff did not file an
objection to the Recommendation.
“In the absence of timely objection, the district court may review a magistrate . . .
[judge’s] report under any standard it deems appropriate.” Summers v. Utah, 927 F.2d
1165, 1167 (10th Cir. 1991) (citing Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985) (stating
that “[i]t does not appear that Congress intended to require district court review of a
magistrate's factual or legal conclusions, under a de novo or any other standard, when
neither party objects to those findings”). The Court concludes that the Magistrate
Judge’s analysis is correct and that “there is no clear error on the face of the record”
associated with the Recommendation. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b) advisory committee’s
note. Therefore, the Court hereby ADOPTS the Report of the United States Magistrate
Judge as the findings and conclusions of this Court.
Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:
1.

Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix’s January 25, 2012 Recommendation is
ACCEPTED;

2.

Plaintiff’s claims against K. O’Brien are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE;

3.

The Clerk shall AMEND the caption to reflect that Defendant K. O’Brien has
been terminated; and

4.

All future filings should omit K. O’Brien as a Defendant.

-2-

Dated this 16th day of March, 2012.

BY THE COURT:

William J. Martínez
United States District Judge

-3-