Gonzales v. Astrue

Filing 9

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/11/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/10/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 2/25/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/13/2011. (sah, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-2344-AP

IRENE GONZALES,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant,

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:
BRANDON M. SELINSKY
4000 Metropolitan Drive
Suite 350
Orange, CA 92868
[phone]
[e-mail]
For Defendant:
JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
/s/ Jessica Milano
JESSICA MILANO
Special Assistant United States
Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Phone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

- 1 -

2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social
Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g).
3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 09/06/2011
B. Date Complaint
09/15/2011
C. Date Answer
11/14/2011

Was

and

Served

on

U.S.

Administrative

Attorney’s

Record

Office:

Were

Filed:

4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge,
administrative record is complete and accurate.

state

that

the

5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
None anticipated.
6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR
DEFENSES
This case does not involve unusually complicated claims.
7. OTHER MATTERS
None.
8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE
A. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: 01/11/12
B. Defendant’s Responsive Brief Due: 02/10/2012
C. Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 02/25/2012
9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiff’s Statement:

Oral argument is not requested

B. Defendant’s Statement:
argument

Defendant

10.

does

not

request

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
- 2 -

oral

A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction
of a United States Magistrate Judge.
B. (x) All parties have not consented to the exercise
jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge.
11.

of

OTHER MATTERS

THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES
MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A
COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S
CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.
12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN

The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered
or amended only upon a showing of good cause.

DATED this 13th day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:
s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE
APPROVED:
JOHN F. WALSH
UNITED STATES ATTORNEY
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
/s/ Brandon M. Selinsky
BRANDON M. SELINSKY
4000 Metropolitan Drive
Suite 350
Orange, CA 92868
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

/s/ Jessica Milano
JESSICA MILANO
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Assistant Regional Counsel
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, CO 80202
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

- 3 -