Gonzales v. Astrue

Filing 9

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER). SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 1/11/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 2/10/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 2/25/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/13/2011. (sah, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-2344-AP IRENE GONZALES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant, JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES 1. APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES For Plaintiff: BRANDON M. SELINSKY 4000 Metropolitan Drive Suite 350 Orange, CA 92868 (714) 564-8644 bselinsky@gmail.com For Defendant: JOHN F. WALSH United States Attorney WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Jessica Milano JESSICA MILANO Special Assistant United States Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Phone: (303) 844-7136 Fax: (303) 844-0770 jessica.milano@ssa.gov - 1 - 2. STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 405(g). 3. DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 09/06/2011 B. Date Complaint 09/15/2011 C. Date Answer 11/14/2011 Was and Served on U.S. Administrative Attorney’s Record Office: Were Filed: 4. STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD The parties, to the best of their knowledge, administrative record is complete and accurate. state that the 5. STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE None anticipated. 6. STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS OR DEFENSES This case does not involve unusually complicated claims. 7. OTHER MATTERS None. 8. BRIEFING SCHEDULE A. Plaintiff’s Opening Brief Due: 01/11/12 B. Defendant’s Responsive Brief Due: 02/10/2012 C. Plaintiff’s Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 02/25/2012 9. STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT A. Plaintiff’s Statement: Oral argument is not requested B. Defendant’s Statement: argument Defendant 10. does not request CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE - 2 - oral A. ( ) All parties have consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. B. (x) All parties have not consented to the exercise jurisdiction of a United States Magistrate Judge. 11. of OTHER MATTERS THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD, AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES. 12. AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only upon a showing of good cause. DATED this 13th day of December, 2011. BY THE COURT: s/John L. Kane U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE APPROVED: JOHN F. WALSH UNITED STATES ATTORNEY WILLIAM G. PHARO Assistant United States Attorney /s/ Brandon M. Selinsky BRANDON M. SELINSKY 4000 Metropolitan Drive Suite 350 Orange, CA 92868 Telephone: (714)564-8644 Facsimile: (714)940-0311 bselinsky@gmail.com /s/ Jessica Milano JESSICA MILANO Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Assistant Regional Counsel Office of the General Counsel Social Security Administration 1001 Seventeenth Street Denver, CO 80202 Telephone: (303) 844-7136 Facsimile: (303) 844-0770 Jessica.milano@ssa.gov - 3 -

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?