CS Capital Corp. v. Local Senior Services et al

Filing 29

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 27 Plaintiff's Motion to Amend and File First Amended Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 1/31/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02357-WYD-MEH
CS CAPITAL CORP., d/b/a THE INVOICE BANKERS CORP.,
Plaintiff,
v.
LOCAL SENIOR SERVICES, and
RANDY KALANI FAHILGA,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on January 31, 2012.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend and File First Amended Complaint [filed January 31, 2012;
docket #27] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The
Court reminds the parties that it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R.
Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has
conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo.
LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added). It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state in the motion,
or in a certificate attached to the motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule...” Id.