Sipes v. Allstate Indemnity Company

Filing 200

ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT'S OBJECTIONS TO DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF STEPHANIE LITTLETON. By Judge Philip A. Brimmer on 10/31/13. (mnfsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Philip A. Brimmer
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02369-PAB-KMT
LARRY SIPES,
Plaintiff,
v.
ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY, an Illinois corporation,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER REGARDING DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO
DESIGNATION OF DEPOSITION TESTIMONY OF STEPHANIE LITTLETON
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on defendant’s Amended Objections to
Plaintiff’s Initial Designation of Deposition Testimony of Stephanie Littleton [Docket No.
164].
The Court rules as follows:
Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

1

26:6-23

No foundation

Overruled.

2

27:7-10

No foundation

Overruled.

3

27:13-17

No foundation

Overruled.

4

30:1-4

No foundation

Overruled.

5

30:25-31:3

No foundation

Overruled.

6

31:12-15

No foundation

Overruled.

7

34:13-15

No foundation

Sustained on grounds the
question was later rephrased.

8

35:3-11

No foundation

Overruled.

Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

9

42:18-21

No foundation

Moot. Designation
withdrawn.

10

44:4-8

No foundation

Overruled.

11

44:12-17

No foundation

Overruled.

12

68:22-25

No foundation

Overruled.

13

70:19-22

No foundation

Overruled.

14

74:24-75:2

No foundation

Overruled.

15

76:2-5

No foundation

Overruled.

16

78:5-11

No foundation

Overruled.

17

78:21-24

No foundation

Overruled.

18

83:16-22

No foundation

Sustained.

19

84:16-22

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

20

87:8-11

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

21

87:20-22

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

22

88:2-24

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

23

89:1-23

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

2

Item #

Testimony

Objection

Ruling

24

90:6-91:11

Relevance; Court
granted defendant’s
Motion in Limine
(Docket No. 138)

Sustained.

25

92:19-22

No foundation

Sustained.

26

93:1-2

No foundation

Sustained.

DATED October 31, 2013.
BY THE COURT:

s/Philip A. Brimmer
PHILIP A. BRIMMER
United States District Judge

3