Trevizo v. Astrue

Filing 10

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/6/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/7/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/22/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 12/19/11. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-002387-AP
VERONICA A. TREVIZO,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Michael W. Seckar, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
[e-mail]

For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
Kevin T. Traskos
Civil Chief
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
William G. Pharo
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street, Sixth Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.
' 405(g).

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.

4.

Date Complaint was filed:
Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney=s Office:
Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed:

September 12, 2011
October 5, 2011
December 5, 2011

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is
complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL CLAIMS
OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the cases raises unusual claims
or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties respectfully request the following briefing schedule:
A.
B.
C.

9.

February 6, 2012
March 7, 2012
March 22, 2012

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A.
B.

10.

Plaintiff=s opening brief due
Defendant=s response brief due
Plaintiff=s reply brief (if any) due

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
2

All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.
11.

OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PRROF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 19th day of December, 2011.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED:
s/ Michael W. Seckar______
Michael W. Seckar, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
[e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN T. TRASKOS
Civil Chief
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
s/Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

4