Day v. Universal Wells Services Inc.

Filing 5

Amended ORDER re: 4 , (signature), by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 9/16/2011. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Senior District Judge Richard P. Matsch Civil Action No. 11-cv-02429-RPM-GJR RICHARD LAROY DAY, Plaintiff, v. UNIVERSAL WELL SERVICES, INC., d/b/a Eastern Reservoir Services, Defendant. ____________________________________________________________________________________ Amended ORDER OF REFERENCE TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE ____________________________________________________________________________________ Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), United States Magistrate Judge Gudrun J. Rice is designated to conduct proceedings in this civil action as follows: (X) Convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of D.C.COLO.LCivR 16.2. (X) Conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause. (X) Convene such settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case. (X) Hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions. ( ) Conduct hearings, including evidentiary hearings, and submit proposed findings of fact and recommendations for rulings on dispositive motions. ( ) Conduct a pretrial conference and enter a pretrial order. It is ORDERED, that this civil action is referred to the named magistrate judge to proceed according to the designations marked (X) above. Dated: September 16th, 2011 BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch _________________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?