Genberg v. Porter

Filing 180

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty: denying without prejudice 159 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution; granting 174 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond Steven S. Porter answer due 1/26/2015. Status Conference held on 1/16/2015: Discovery due by 8/14/2015, Dispositive Motions due by 9/11/2015, Final Pretrial Conference set for 10/29/2015 09:30 AM in Courtroom A 501 before Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty. FTR: Courtroom A 501. (mdave)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty
Civil Action No:
Courtroom Deputy:

11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH
Molly Davenport

Date: January 16, 2015
FTR: Courtroom A 501

Parties:

Counsel:

CARL GENBERG

Pro se

Plaintiff,
v.
STEVEN S. PORTER

Michelle Albert
Edwin Aro

Defendant.
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER
STATUS CONFERENCE
Court in session:

10:12 a.m.

The Court calls case. Appearances of counsel.
IT IS ORDERED THAT the [159] Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Prosecution or for Entry of
Show Cause Order is DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS ORDERED THAT all documents requested through discovery are to be produced on or
before February 13, 2015. All objections, with the exception of privilege, are waived.
[174] MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer or Otherwise Respond to Third Amended
Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant’s answer is due by January 26, 2015.
Discovery deadline: August 14, 2015
Dispositive Motion deadline: September 11, 2015
Discussion was held regarding discovery issues and pending requests for discovery. Regarding
the pending subpoena duces tecum issued by the plaintiff, IT IS ORDERED THAT the subpoenas
do not need to be re-served. The recipients have 14 days from the date of this Order to respond.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the subpoena duces tecum served on Arnold & Porter, LLP
is QUASHED.

The Final Pretrial Conference is set for October 29, 2015 at 9:30 a.m. before Magistrate Judge
Hegarty in Courtroom a 501.
Discussion was held regarding search terms and parameters to be used to search the plaintiff’s
computer.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT a Protective Order is to be put in place prior to the plaintiff’s
production of documents.
Court in recess: 11:54 a.m.
Total time in court: 1:42

(Hearing concluded)

To obtain a transcript of this hearing, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at [phone].