Genberg v. Porter
MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 229 Motion for Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/01/2015.(mdave, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH
STEVEN S. PORTER,
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 1, 2015.
Defendant’s [Re-Filed] Unopposed Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order [filed
November 27, 2015; docket #229] is once again denied without prejudice, and the proposed
Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to re-file their motion and again
submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196
F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court requires a specific mechanism by which the parties
may challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. Notably, Gillard
requires the party designating information as confidential to file a motion and carry the burden
when such designation is challenged, which is counter to the approach taken in Defendant’s
proposed Stipulated Protective Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?