Genberg v. Porter

Filing 233

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 229 Motion for Protective Order by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 12/01/2015.(mdave, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02434-WYD-MEH CARL GENBERG, Plaintiff, v. STEVEN S. PORTER, Defendant. MINUTE ORDER Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on December 1, 2015. Defendant’s [Re-Filed] Unopposed Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order [filed November 27, 2015; docket #229] is once again denied without prejudice, and the proposed Stipulated Protective Order is refused. The parties are granted leave to re-file their motion and again submit a revised proposed protective order consistent with Gillard v. Boulder Valley Sch. Dist., 196 F.R.D. 382 (D. Colo. 2000), in which the Court requires a specific mechanism by which the parties may challenge the designation of information as confidential. See id. at 388-89. Notably, Gillard requires the party designating information as confidential to file a motion and carry the burden when such designation is challenged, which is counter to the approach taken in Defendant’s proposed Stipulated Protective Order.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?