United Food & Commercial Workers International Union, Local No. 7 v. King Soopers, Inc.
Filing
40
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 3/24/14. As directed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit IT IS ORDERED: Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment 16 is GRANTED. Judgment shall enter in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant; Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support 17 is DENIED; The order awarding defendant its costs 24 is VACATED; and The plaintiff may have its costs, to be taxed and allowed in the time and manner prescribed. (bsimm)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02449-BNB-KMT
UNITED FOOD & COMMERCIAL WORKERS INTERNATIONAL UNION, LOCAL NO. 7,
Plaintiff,
v.
KING SOOPERS, INC.,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
As directed by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 12-1409, in
its opinion and order issued on February 28, 2014,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc.#16, filed 02/17/2012] and its
request to confirm and enforce the arbitration award of Arbitrator Harold G. Wren issued on
June 3, 2011, are GRANTED. Judgment shall enter in favor of the plaintiff and against the
defendant enforcing the award;
(2)
Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support [Doc #17, filed
02/17/2012] is DENIED;
(3)
The order awarding defendant its costs [Doc. #24, p. 13, ΒΆ c] is VACATED; and
(4)
The plaintiff may have its costs, to be taxed and allowed in the time and manner
prescribed by Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1.
Dated March 24, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?