Johantgen v. Astrue

Filing 12

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 2/6/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 3/7/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 3/22/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 1/5/12. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02463-AP
JENNIFER JOHANTGEN,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________
JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES
______________________________________________________________________
1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES
For Plaintiff:

For Defendant:

Robert K. Gruber
3500 S. Wadsworth Blvd., #215
Lakewood, CO 80235-2382
303-986-6400
Fax, 303-986-6800
[e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN TRASKOS
KEVIN TRASKOS
Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
Robert L. Van Saghi
Special Assistant United States Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[phone] (facsimile)
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g), 1383(c)

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A. Date Complaint Was Filed: 9/19/11
B. Date Complaint Was Served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: 9/22/11
C. Date Answer and Administrative Record Were Filed: 12/16/11

4.

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
To the best of his knowledge, Plaintiff states that the record is complete and accurate.
To the best of his knowledge, Defendant states that the record is complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
The parties do not anticipate submitting additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASE RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties state that this case does not raise unusual claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
The parties state that there are no other matters.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
The parties agreed to the following schedule:
A. Plaintiffs Opening Brief Due:
2/6/12
B. Defendant’s Response Brief Due:
3/7/12
C. Plaintiffs Reply Brief (If Any) Due: 3/22/12

9.

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
A. Plaintiffs Statement: Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
B. Defendant’s Statement: Defendant does not request oral argument.

-2-

10.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.

11.

OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PROOF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN SERVED
UPON THE MOVING ATTORNEY’S CLIENT, ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD,
AND ALL PRO SE PARTIES.

12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended only
upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 5th day of January 2012.
BY THE COURT:

s/John L. Kane
_______
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED:
For Plaintiff:

For Defendant:

s/ Robert K. Gruber
Robert K. Gruber
3500 S. Wadsworth Blvd., #215
Lakewood, CO 80235-2382
303-986-6400
Fax, 303-986-6800
[e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
KEVIN TRASKOS
Chief, Civil Division
United States Attorney’s Office
District of Colorado
[e-mail]
s/ Robert L. Van Saghi
Robert L. Van Saghi
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
1001 17th Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

4