Bond Safeguard Insurance Company v. Jimmy Camp Development, Inc. et al

Filing 69

ORDER RE: GARNISHMENT OF WELLS FARGO PARTIAL RESOLUTION. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 4/5/2013.(cmacd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 11-cv-02547-CMA-KLM BOND SAFEGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. JIMMY CAMP DEVELOPMENT, INC., a/k/a JIMMY CAMP DEV., INC., a/k/a JIMMY CAMP, LLC, ALLEN D. VAN WHYHE, CARY L. CARPENTER, and GEORGE KRAMER, Defendants. ORDER RE: GARNISHMENT OF WELLS FARGO – PARTIAL RESOLUTION The Court, having reviewed the Stipulated Verified Motion For Partial Resolution of Garnishment Issues Between Plaintiff and Cumberland Green Metropolitan District (“Motion”) (Doc. # 65), and being fully advised of the premises, ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED. 1. Wells Fargo is currently holding $312,612.33 of funds in an account of the Cumberland Green Metropolitan District (“District”) as a result of Wells Fargo's Answer to a writ of garnishment (“writ”) filed with the Court on March 7, 2013. 2. $200,000.00 of the $312,612.33 referred to in the preceding paragraph is hereby released from the impact of the writ so that the District will satisfy its obligation to provide the unencumbered $200,000.00 reserve fund described in the Motion, and the funds shall be used for no other purpose. 3. As of the time of the filing of the Motion, the said $200,000.00 shall be considered unencumbered by the writ. 4. Wells Fargo shall continue to hold the remaining funds in the account for the District maintained at Wells Fargo until it receives further Orders of this Court. 5. Upon receipt of this Order, the District shall immediately inform Wells Fargo of its entry. DATED: April 05 , 2013 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?