Stringer et al v. USA
Filing
64
ORDER APPROVING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 63 : (see Order for deadlines) Motions for summary judgment due by 6/3/2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/29/2013. (rpmcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02584-RPM
(Coordinated with cases 11-cv-02550-RPM, 11-cv-02817-RPM, 11-cv-02819-RPM, and
12-cv-0876-RPM, 12-cv-1069-RPM, 12-cv-1724-RPM)
KEVIN STRINGER,
RYAN O’NEILL,
JOAQUIN MARTINEZ,
CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, and
WILLIAM LEGER III, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendant.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER APPROVING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
______________________________________________________________________________
Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule [63] filed March 28,
2013, it is
ORDERED that the parties in this case shall proceed on the following schedule:
•
Deadline for Plaintiff O’Neill to confer with Defendant on any dispute as to the
administrative record filed at Dkt. 34: April 22, 2013.
•
Defendant for Plaintiff O’Neill to file any motion to supplement the record and/or
any motion to seek discovery: April 29, 2013. If Plaintiff O’Neill files any such
motion, the response and reply deadlines shall be governed by
D.C.COLO.L.Civ.R. 7.1, and the parties will confer at that time and propose
appropriate modifications to the remaining schedule.
•
The deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment: Plaintiff O’Neill’s
motion by May 13, 2013; Defendant’s opposition and cross-motion by June 3,
2013. The remaining response and reply deadlines shall be governed by D.C.
COLO. L.Civ.R. 7.1.
Dated: March 29th, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/Richard P. Matsch
____________________________
Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?