Stringer et al v. USA

Filing 64

ORDER APPROVING BRIEFING SCHEDULE re 63 : (see Order for deadlines) Motions for summary judgment due by 6/3/2013, by Judge Richard P. Matsch on 3/29/2013. (rpmcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02584-RPM (Coordinated with cases 11-cv-02550-RPM, 11-cv-02817-RPM, 11-cv-02819-RPM, and 12-cv-0876-RPM, 12-cv-1069-RPM, 12-cv-1724-RPM) KEVIN STRINGER, RYAN O’NEILL, JOAQUIN MARTINEZ, CHRISTOPHER ANDERSON, and WILLIAM LEGER III, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER APPROVING BRIEFING SCHEDULE ______________________________________________________________________________ Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Proposed Briefing Schedule [63] filed March 28, 2013, it is ORDERED that the parties in this case shall proceed on the following schedule: • Deadline for Plaintiff O’Neill to confer with Defendant on any dispute as to the administrative record filed at Dkt. 34: April 22, 2013. • Defendant for Plaintiff O’Neill to file any motion to supplement the record and/or any motion to seek discovery: April 29, 2013. If Plaintiff O’Neill files any such motion, the response and reply deadlines shall be governed by D.C.COLO.L.Civ.R. 7.1, and the parties will confer at that time and propose appropriate modifications to the remaining schedule. • The deadlines for filing motions for summary judgment: Plaintiff O’Neill’s motion by May 13, 2013; Defendant’s opposition and cross-motion by June 3, 2013. The remaining response and reply deadlines shall be governed by D.C. COLO. L.Civ.R. 7.1. Dated: March 29th, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/Richard P. Matsch ____________________________ Richard P. Matsch, Senior Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?