Wake v. SSC Greeley Centennial Operating Company, LLC et al

Filing 25

MINUTE ORDER Denying without prejudice 23 Defendants Motion for Leave to Designate Non Parties at Fault Pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-21-111.5(3)(b), for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 8/1/2012.(ervsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02630-WJM-MEH
ROY WAKE,
Plaintiff,
v.
SSC GREELEY CENTENNIAL OPERATING COMPANY, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, and
SAVASENIORCARE ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company,
Defendants.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on August 1, 2012.
Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Designate Non Parties at Fault Pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-21111.5(3)(b) [filed July 31, 2012; docket #23] is denied without prejudice for failure to comply with
D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A, which states,
The court will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P.
12 or 56, unless counsel for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the
motion, has conferred or made reasonable, good-faith efforts to confer with
opposing counsel or a pro se party to resolve the disputed matter. The moving
party shall state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the motion, the
specific efforts to comply with this rule.
(emphasis added). The Court reminds the parties of their continuing obligations to comply fully
with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. See Hoelzel v. First Select Corp., 214 F.R.D. 634, 636 (D. Colo.
2003) (because Rule 7.1A requires meaningful negotiations by the parties, the rule is not satisfied
by one party sending the other party a single email, letter or voicemail).