Stewart Title Guaranty Company v. Williams et al
Filing
76
AMENDED ORDER For Entry of Judgment re: 72 Order on Motion for Judgment, nunc pro tunc 4/16/2013, by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/14/2013. (ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02636-WJM-CBS
STEWART TITLE GUARANTY COMPANY, a Texas corporation,
Plaintiff,
v.
JAY H. WILLIAMS, an individual, and
NEWTOWN TEN, INC., a Colorado corporation
Defendants.
AMENDED ORDER FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
This matter comes before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation (“Stipulation”)
(ECF No. 67). The Court having reviewed the Stipulation and all related exhibits,
pleadings and documents, and being fully advised in the premises, hereby ORDERS as
follows:
1.
The Parties Motion for Judgment is GRANTED (ECF No. 69).
2.
Consistent with the Stipulation and pursuant to F.R.C.P 54, final judgment
is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants, jointly and
severally, on Plaintiff’s Third Claim for Relief - Fraud related to Lien
Affidavit and Plaintiff’s Fourth Claim for Relief - Fraud related to Omnibus
Amendment for the total principal amount of $800,000.00, plus postjudgment interest from the date of the Settlement Agreement at the rate of
36% per annum (“Fraud Judgment”).
3.
Plaintiff shall be entitled to its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs
incurred in attempting to collect and/or enforce the Fraud Judgment, which
fees and costs shall be added to and included in the judgment amount.
4.
Pursuant to the Stipulation of the parties and this Court’s Order approving
same, execution of the Fraud Judgment is stayed so long as Defendants
fulfil their payment obligation to Plaintiff.
5.
The Clerk shall enter Final Judgment in accordance with this Order.
Dated this 14th day of November, 2013, nunc pro tunc 16th day of April, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
__________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?