Okland Construction Company, Inc. v. Phoenix Insurance Company, The et al
Filing
116
COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland: Motion Hearing held on 1/18/2013. 97 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. FTR: BNB Courtroom A401. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
MAGISTRATE JUDGE BOYD N. BOLAND
Civil Action:
Courtroom Deputy:
11-cv-02652-LTB-BNB
Julie Dynes
Date: January 18, 2013
FTR: BNB COURTROOM A-401
Parties
Attorney(s)
OKLAND CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC
Plaintiff(s)
Jose A. Ramirez
v.
THE PHOENIX INSURANCE COMPANY
THE TRAVELERS INDEMNITY COMPANY OF
AMERICA
ST. PAUL FIRE AND MARINE INSURANCE
COMPANY
ST. PAUL SURPLUS LINES INSURANCE
COMPANY
TRAVELERS PROPERTY CASUALTY
COMPANY OF AMERICA
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL SPECIALTY
LINES INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant(s)
Ryan J. Hesselgesser
Hilary D. Wells
Todd E. Jaworsky
EVEREST NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cross Defendant(s)
COURTROOM MINUTES
MOTION HEARING
Court in Session: 10:00 a.m.
Appearance of counsel.
Argument presented on [97] The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity
Company of America, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus Lines
Insurance Company and Travelers Property Casualty Company of America’s Motion to Compel
or in the Alternative Motion for Protective Order.
ORDERED: [97] The Phoenix Insurance Company, The Travelers Indemnity Company
of America, St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company, St. Paul Surplus
Lines Insurance Company and Travelers Property Casualty Company of
America’s Motion to Compel or in the Alternative Motion for Protective
Order is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as indicated on the
record.
Court in Recess: 10:56 a.m. Hearing concluded.
Total time in Court: 00:56
* To obtain a transcript of this proceeding, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?