Dowling v. Black and McDonald/Custom Lighting Services

Filing 77

MINUTE ORDER granting in part and denying in part 73 "Motion to Clarify the Term "Press of Business" and Motion for an Extension of Two Weeks". Plaintiff's Motion is GRANTED in part to the extent that it seeks an extens ion of time to respond to "Defendants Response to Plaintiff's Response to Order to Show Cause." (Doc. No. 63 , filed June 13, 2012.) Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendant's Response no later than July 19, 2012. by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 7/12/12.(mjgsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 11–cv–02696–REB–KMT

THERESA L. DOWLING,
Plaintiff,
v.
BLACK AND MCDONALD/CUSTOM LIGHTING SERVICES,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Motion to Clarify the Term ‘Press of Business’ and Motion for an Extension of Two
Weeks” (Doc. No. 73, filed July 2, 2012) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiff’s
Motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks to have the court clarify the term “press of business.”
The court cannot act as an advocate for a pro se party or issue advisory opinions as to the
interpretation or import of the rules and standards governing practice in federal court.
Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED in part to the extent that it seeks an extension of time to
respond to “Defendant’s Response to Plaintiff’s Response to Order to Show Cause.” (Doc. No.
63, filed June 13, 2012.) Plaintiff may file a reply to Defendant’s Response no later than July
19, 2012.
Dated: July 12, 2012