Dowling v. Black and McDonald/Custom Lighting Services

Filing 86

JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 85 Order on Motion for Leave and Order on Report and Recommendations, by Clerk on 2/27/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02696-REB-KMT THERESA L. DOWLING, Plaintiff, v. BLACK AND McDONALD/CUSTOM LIGHTING SERVICES, Defendant. FINAL JUDGMENT This Final Judgment is entered pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and in accordance with the Order Overruling Objections to and Adopting Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge [#85] entered by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on February 25, 2013, which order is incorporated herein by this reference. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That claims of the plaintiff are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as a sanction for the unexcused failure to prosecute and failure to comply with the orders of the court; 2. That JUDGMENT IS ENTERED in favor of the defendant, Black and McDonald / Custom Lighting Services, against the plaintiff, Theresa L. Dowling, on all claims for relief and causes of action asserted in this case; 3. That under 28 U.S.C. ยง 1915(a)(3), the Court certifies that any appeal from the recommendation [#84] and the order would not be taken in good faith and, therefore, any appeal from the recommendation and the order may not be taken in forma pauperis; 4. That if the plaintiff files a notice of appeal, she must pay the full $455.00 appellate filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit; and 5. That defendant is AWARDED its costs, to be taxed by the clerk of the court under Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(d)(1) and D.C.COLO.LCivR 54.1. Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 27th day of February 2013. BY THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/ Edward P. Butler Edward P. Butler, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?