USA v. Berryman et al

Filing 115

AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT by Clerk re: 114 Order on Unopposed Motion for Corrected Final Judgment under Rule 60(a). By Clerk on 3/19/2015. (alowe)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff/s, v. NANCY D. BERRYMAN; THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD; THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT; and her successors, a corporation sole, Defendants. AMENDED FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Granting United States' Unopposed Motion for Corrected Final Judgment under Rule 60(a), filed on September 27, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that the Clerk shall correct the final judgment [ECF No. 107], so that it includes both the judgment against Defendant Berryman for the tax years 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, in the amount of $142,595.58, plus other statutory additions from October 1, 2012, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full (ECF No. 77, p. 16), and the judgment against Defendant Berryman for the tax year 1997 in the amount of $395,136.63 as of December 2, 2013, plus other statutory additions from December 2, 2013, in -1- accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full. (ECF No. 106, p. 8). Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed on September 27, 2013, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mix [ECF Doc. No. 66] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. The Objections [ECF Doc. Nos. 67 and 68] are OVERRULED. It is further ORDERED that default judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, and against Defendants, Nancy D. Berryman; the Temple of the Unveiled God; the Office of the Overseer of Dedication to Enlightenment; and Her Successors, a Corporation Sole, regarding Defendant Berryman's tax liability for the tax years 1999, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006, in the total amount of $142,595.58, plus other statutory additions from October 1, 2012, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full. It is further ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue on the total amount of $142,595.58 at the current rate of 0.10%, as calculated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of judgment. Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a) and the Order Affirming and Adopting Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge, filed on May 16, 2014, by the Honorable Wiley Y. Daniel, Senior United States District Judge, and -2- incorporated herein by reference as if fully set forth, it is hereby ORDERED that the Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Mix [ECF Doc. No. 99] is AFFIRMED AND ADOPTED. It is further ORDERED that judgment is hereby entered in favor of Plaintiff, United States of America, and against Defendant, Nancy D. Berryman, in the total amount of $395,136.63 as of December 2, 2013, plus other statutory additions from December 2, 203, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1961(c)(1) and 26 U.S.C. § 6621, until judgment is paid in full. It is further ORDERED that an Order of Foreclosure and Decree of Sale of the Subject Property shall enter in favor of the Plaintiff. It is further ORDERED that post-judgment interest shall accrue at the current rate of 0.09%, as calculated pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961, from the date of entry of judgment. DATED at Denver, Colorado this 19th day of March, 2015. FOR THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK /s/ Robert R. Keech Robert R. Keech, Deputy Clerk -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?