USA v. Berryman et al

Filing 97

MINUTE ORDER denying as moot 95 Renewed and Extended Objection to, and Request to the Court to Deny United States' Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman Per Magistrate Judge's Granted Extension of Time Until o r Before January 6th, 2014. The Court accepts the Motion as Defendant Berrymans Response to Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman. Plaintiff shall timely file a Reply to the Response by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 01/08/14.(jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 11-cv-02708-WYD-KLM UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. NANCY D. BERRYMAN, THE TEMPLE OF THE UNVEILED GOD, and THE OFFICE OF THE OVERSEER OF DEDICATION TO ENLIGHTENMENT, and her successors, a corporation sole, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER _____________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Defendant Nancy Berryman’s (“Berryman”) Renewed and Extended Objection to, and Request to the Court to Deny United States’ Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman Per Magistrate Judge’s Granted Extension of Time Until or Before January 6th, 2014 [#95] (the “Motion”). Having reviewed the Motion, the Court finds that it is intended by Defendant Berryman, who proceeds as a pro se litigant in this matter, to be her Response to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#95] is DENIED as moot. The Court accepts the Motion as Defendant Berryman’s Response to Plaintiff’s Renewed Motion for Summary Judgment Against Nancy D. Berryman. Plaintiff shall timely file a Reply to the Response. Dated: January 8, 2014 -1-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?