Fresquez v. Minks et al
Filing
43
MINUTE ORDER granting 41 Motion which seeks a copy of his (Plaintiff's) SecondAmended Prisoner Complaint, by Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on 4/18/12.(mjgsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya
Civil Action No. 11–cv–02712–REB–KMT
LEROY DAMASIO FRESQUEZ,
Plaintiff,
v.
SHERIFF TED MINKS,
MICHAEL FISH, Detention Service Manager,
JOHN DOE (CAPTAIN), March 5, 2010,
LT. MARTINALLI,
LT. G. GITTIN,
LT. J. LUCAS,
ADMINISTRATIVE SGT. RENFRO,
SGT. TROY BETKA,
SGT. SCOTT HAPP,
SGT. STEVEN WYGANT,
OFFICER KATHRINE FEROE,
DEPUTY SHERIFF CRUMBAKER,
DEPUTY SHERIFF RYAN VIERS,
DEPUTY SHERIFF DUSTIN DYELING,
DEPUTY SHERIFF ANTHONY KOTRIS,
DEPUTY SHERIFF DONALD SPRINGFIELD,
DEPUTY SHERIFF HOLLEY,
DEPUTY SHERIFF JAMES GELEUDE,
DEPUTY SHERIFF JASON RICHARDSON,
DEPUTY SHERIFF REID PERRY,
DEPUTY SHERIFF WILLIAM BOHM,
DEPUTY SHERIFF ERIK BOUGHAM,
DEPUTY SHERIFF HERBERT LONGSHORE,
DEPUTY SHERIFF #1958 (Name Unknown),
COUNSELOR MIKE COLLINS,
COUNSELOR SUPERVISOR DEBRA ELUDO,
CORRECTIONAL HEALTHCARE MANAGEMENT,
CLAUDIA VAN BUREN/HSA,
RAYMOND HERR, Responsible Physician,
TRACY HAINES, LPN, and
KATHERINE BECERRA, RN,
Defendants.
MINUTE ORDER
ORDER ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KATHLEEN M. TAFOYA
Plaintiff’s “Motion” (Doc. No. 41, filed Apr. 17, 2012), which seeks a copy of his Second
Amended Prisoner Complaint, is GRANTED. In the court’s prior Minute Order (Doc. No. 35,
filed Apr. 9, 2012), the court erroneously directed the clerk to mail Plaintiff a copy of his
Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. No. 9), rather than the Second Amended Prisoner Complaint
(Doc. No. 17) as requested. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to mail Plaintiff a copy
of his Second Amended Prisoner Complaint (Doc. No. 17). Plaintiff is again advised that the
court will not provide him with additional copies of court filings in the future.
Dated: April 18, 2012
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?