Basanti v. Metcalf et al

Filing 166

ORDER: The Motion to Exceed Time [ 157] is GRANTED. The Motion for Clarification 161 is GRANTED as follows: The extension of the discovery cut-off was only to allow scheduling of depositions already identified by the parties, and those largely (if not exclusively) involved expert witnesses. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/24/13. (bnbcd, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB DALIP BASANTI, Plaintiff, v. JEFFREY METCALF, M.D., JASON ROZESKI, M.D., PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. ______________________________________________________________________________ ORDER ______________________________________________________________________________ This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Exceed Deposition Time Limit for David Schade, M.D. [Doc. # 157, filed 5/14/2013] (the “Motion to Exceed Time”); and (2) Platte Valley’s Motion for Clarification of Magistrate’s Order Regarding Discovery [Doc. # 161, filed 5/23/2013] (the “Motion for Clarification”). I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to Exceed Time [Doc. # 157] is GRANTED. (2) The Motion for Clarification [Doc. # 161] is GRANTED as follows: The extension of the discovery cut-off was only to allow scheduling of depositions already identified by the parties, and those largely (if not exclusively) involved expert witnesses. The deposition of Anita Pankowski was not discussed at the hearing nor contemplated by me in connection with extending the discovery cut-off. Accordingly, the deposition of Ms. Pankowski shall not be had. Dated May 24, 2013. BY THE COURT: s/ Boyd N. Boland United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?