Basanti v. Metcalf et al
Filing
166
ORDER: The Motion to Exceed Time [ 157] is GRANTED. The Motion for Clarification 161 is GRANTED as follows: The extension of the discovery cut-off was only to allow scheduling of depositions already identified by the parties, and those largely (if not exclusively) involved expert witnesses. by Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland on 5/24/13. (bnbcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Magistrate Judge Boyd N. Boland
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02765-PAB-BNB
DALIP BASANTI,
Plaintiff,
v.
JEFFREY METCALF, M.D.,
JASON ROZESKI, M.D.,
PLATTE VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER, and
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Defendants.
______________________________________________________________________________
ORDER
______________________________________________________________________________
This matter arises on the following:
(1)
Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Exceed Deposition Time Limit for David
Schade, M.D. [Doc. # 157, filed 5/14/2013] (the “Motion to Exceed Time”); and
(2)
Platte Valley’s Motion for Clarification of Magistrate’s Order Regarding
Discovery [Doc. # 161, filed 5/23/2013] (the “Motion for Clarification”).
I held a hearing on the motions this afternoon and made rulings on the record, which are
incorporated here.
IT IS ORDERED:
(1)
The Motion to Exceed Time [Doc. # 157] is GRANTED.
(2)
The Motion for Clarification [Doc. # 161] is GRANTED as follows: The
extension of the discovery cut-off was only to allow scheduling of depositions already identified
by the parties, and those largely (if not exclusively) involved expert witnesses. The deposition
of Anita Pankowski was not discussed at the hearing nor contemplated by me in connection with
extending the discovery cut-off. Accordingly, the deposition of Ms. Pankowski shall not be had.
Dated May 24, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Boyd N. Boland
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?