Weston v. Ciber, Inc. et al
Filing
94
ORDER Approving Plan of Allocation of Settlement Proceeds. By Judge John L. Kane on 4/4/2014.(klyon, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 1:11-cv-02827-JLK
BURT WESTON, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
CIBER, INC.,
DAVID C. PETERSCHMIDT,
CLAUDE J. PUMILIA and
PETER H. CHEESBROUGH,
Defendants.
ORDER APPROVING PLAN OF ALLOCATION OF SETTLEMENT PROCEEDS
This matter having come before the Court on April 4, 2014, on Lead Plaintiffs’ motion for
approval of the Plan of Allocation of settlement proceeds in the above-captioned action; the Court
having considered all papers filed and proceedings had herein; and otherwise being fully informed in
the premises;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that:
1.
For purposes of this Order, the terms used herein shall have the same meanings as set
forth in the Stipulation of Settlement, dated as of November 26, 2013 (the “Stipulation”), and filed
with the Court.
2.
Pursuant to and in compliance with Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
this Court hereby finds and concludes that due and adequate notice was directed to all Persons and
entities who are Settlement Class Members and who could be identified with reasonable effort,
advising them of the Plan of Allocation and of their right to object thereto, and a full and fair
opportunity was accorded to all Persons and entities who are Settlement Class Members to be heard
with respect to the Plan of Allocation. No Settlement Class Member objected to the Plan of
Allocation.
3.
The Court hereby finds and concludes that the formula for the calculation of the
claims of Authorized Claimants which is set forth in the Notice of Pendency of Settlement (the
“Notice”) sent to Settlement Class Members, provides a fair and reasonable basis upon which to
allocate the proceeds of the Net Settlement Fund established by the Stipulation among Settlement
Class Members, with due consideration having been given to administrative convenience and
necessity.
-1-
4.
This Court hereby finds and concludes that the Plan of Allocation set forth in the
Notice is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and adequate and the Court hereby approves the Plan of
Allocation.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: April 4, 2014
_s/John L. Kane
_______________
THE HONORABLE JOHN L. KANE
SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?