Zasada v. Englewood Police Department et al

Filing 82

MINUTE ORDER denying 79 Defendant South Metro Drug Task Force's Motion to Modify Scheduling Order, by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 07/25/2012.(wjcsl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-02834-MSK-MJW
IRENEUSZ (ERIC) ZASADA,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
ENGLEWOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT,
CITY OF ENGLEWOOD,
THE BOARD OF THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF DOUGLAS COUNTY OF THE
STATE OF COLORADO,
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
SOUTH METRO DRUG TASK FORCE,
SERGEANT KELLY MARTIN, in his individual capacity,
LIEUTENANT TOMMY BARELLA, in his individual capacity, and
CHIEF TOM VANDERMEE, in his individual capacity,
Defendant(s).
MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe
It is hereby ORDERED that Defendant South Metro Drug Task Force’s Motion to
Modify Scheduling Order (docket no. 79) is DENIED. This court has previously ordered
the parties to seek “private ADR by the discovery cut off date.” See paragraph 10 a. in
the Scheduling Order (docket no. 30 at 15). I find that paragraph 10 a. in the
Scheduling Order (docket no. 30 at 15) directing the parties to seek private ADR by the
discovery cut off date was entered consistent with [1] Judge Krieger’s Order of
Reference (docket no. 2), [2] 28 U.S.C. § 652, and [3] Fed. R. Civ. P. 1. The mere fact
that dispositive motions are pending is not a basis for vacating paragraph 10 a. in the
Scheduling Order (docket no. 30 at 15). Accordingly, all parties shall participate in
private ADR by the discovery cut off date. ADR includes, but is not limited to,
mediation, early neutral evaluation, mini-trial, and arbitration as authorized in 28 U.S.C.
§§ 654 through 658.
Date: July 25, 2012