Rossi Ventures, Inc. et al v. Pasquini et al

Filing 101

ORDER denying 87 Motion to Clarify. Defendants shall immediately comply with the preliminary injuction. By Judge Christine M. Arguello on 8/7/12.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Christine M. Arguello Civil Action No. 11-cv-02838-CMA-BNB ROSSI VENTURES, INC., and Y. MELINDA PASQUINI, Plaintiffs, v. ANTONIO PASQUINI, PASQUINI FRANCHISING, LLC, PASQUINI=S RESTAURANTS, LLC, PASQUINI=S CHERRY CREEK, LLC, PASQUINI=S 17th, LLC, and PASQUINI=S COLFAX, LLC, Defendants. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Clarification. (Doc. # 87.) On June 28, 2012, this Court adopted and affirmed Magistrate Judge Boland’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. # 56) and thereby granted Plaintiffs’ Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Doc. # 14). (Doc. # 78.) In the instant motion, Defendants seek an additional 90 days to comply with the injunction. (See Doc. # 87.) However, Plaintiffs argue, and the Court agrees, that granting such a request would defeat one of the primary purposes of a preliminary injunction—i.e., to provide expedited relief to a party that would otherwise suffer imminent harm. (See Doc. # 96.) Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Defendants Motion for Clarification (Doc. # 87) be DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants SHALL IMMEDIATELY COMPLY with the preliminary injunction that has been ordered against them. DATED: August 07 , 2012 BY THE COURT: _______________________________ CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO United States District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?