Yonehiro v. Kiku Corporation et al

Filing 25

ORDER That the Stipulation of Partial Dismissal of Defendant Mas Torito With Prejudice 24 filed February 10, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiffs claims against defendant Mas Torito are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs; That defendant, Mas Torito, is DROPPED as a named party to this litigation, and the case caption is amended accordingly, by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 2/10/2012. (ervsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 11-cv-02848-REB-KLM GRANT YONEHIRO, Plaintiff, v. KIKU CORPORATION d/b/a KOKORO and MAS TORITO, in all capacities, Defendants. ORDER OF DISMISSAL AS TO DEFENDANT, MAS TORITO, ONLY Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation of Partial Dismissal of Defendant Mas Torito With Prejudice [#24]1 filed February 10, 2012. After reviewing the stipulation and the file, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that plaintiff’s claims against defendant, Mas Torito, should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation of Partial Dismissal of Defendant Mas Torito With Prejudice [#24] filed February 10, 2012, is APPROVED; 2. That plaintiff’s claims against defendant Mas Torito are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each of the affected parties to pay its own attorney fees and costs; and “[#24]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 1 3. That defendant, Mas Torito, is DROPPED as a named party to this litigation, and the case caption is amended accordingly. Dated February 10, 2012, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?