Stransky et al v. HealthONE of Denver, LLC et al

Filing 246

MINUTE ENTRY for Status Conference/Motion Hearing held before Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 7/8/2014. Granting 237 Defendant's Motion to Clarify the Number of Depositions it May Take Without Leave of Court Or, in the Alternative, D efendant's Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions and Request for Expedited Consideration. Court grants the request for 11 additional depositions, without leave of Court. Defendant may take 15 more depositions. Discovery cut-off ext ended to 9/22/2014. Dispositive Motions deadline extended to 11/21/2014. Plaintiffs are given until 7/22/2014 to provide individuals to be deposed. Plaintiff's Oral Motion to Extend Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline is granted, up to and including 8/22/2014. FTR: Courtroom A-502. (eseam)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe Civil Action No. 11-cv-02888-WJM-MJW consolidated with 14-cv-00042-WJM-MJW FTR - Courtroom A-502 Date: July 8, 2014 Courtroom Deputy, Emily Seamon Parties LISA STRANSKY, NATALIE FIORE, ERIN PEREZ, HELEN GEIST, ANGIE VANLENGEN, BROOKE THOMPSON, MILDRED HAMILTON, NICOLE WAGNER, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, MILDRED BROOKS, HAYKE CAPERTON, JASON CAPERTON, JENNIFER CAYLOR, ANGELA ELLIOTT, CATHY GORDON, MICHELLE LUGO, KATHY OKAMATSU, ANN MARIE UWANDU, and SALLY ANN WARDLE, Counsel Katherine Wilson Elwyn Schaefer Plaintiffs, v. HEALTHONE OF DENVER, INC., Defendant. Martine Wells Sarah Stettner Charles Grell COURTROOM MINUTES / MINUTE ORDER HEARING: STATUS CONFERENCE / MOTION HEARING Court in Session: 10:01 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel. Counsel confirm they received the Order Adopting June 13, 2014 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Regarding the Dismissal of Twelve Opt-In Plaintiffs (Doc. No. 243). The matter before the Court today is Defendant’s Motion to Clarify the Number of Depositions it May Take Without Leave of the Court Or, in the Alternative, Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions and Request for Expedited Consideration (Doc. No. 237). Counsel agree to certain facts to narrow the scope of the hearing. Discussion regarding depositions taken and departments and positions within HealthONE. 10:11 a.m. Argument by Ms. Wells regarding Defendant’s Motion to Clarify (Doc. No. 237). 10:13 a.m. Response by Ms. Wilson. 10:21 a.m. Reply by Ms. Wells. ORDERED: Defendant’s Motion to Clarify the Number of Depositions it May Take Without Leave of the Court Or, in the Alternative, Defendant’s Motion for Leave to Take Additional Depositions and Request for Expedited Consideration [Doc. No. 237, filed June 27, 2014] is GRANTED. Court grants the request for 11 additional depositions, without leave of Court. Defendant may take 15 more depositions (the original 4 depositions, plus the additional 11 depositions). Each deposition shall be limited to 3 hours. Defendant shall follow the same protocol of providing notice of the depositions to the Plaintiffs. The discovery cut-off is extended to September 22, 2014. The dispositive motion deadline is extended to November 21, 2014. Plaintiffs are given until July 22, 2014 to provide individuals to be deposed. Discussion regarding Defendant providing back-up individuals to be deposed. Discussion regarding the special master issue and rebuttal disclosure deadline. Court notes that Judge Martinez will address the motion to appoint a special master (Doc. No. 236). ORDERED: Plaintiff’s Oral Motion to Extend Rebuttal Expert Disclosure Deadline is GRANTED, up to and including August 22, 2014. Hearing concluded. Court in Recess: 10:50 a.m. Page 2 of 3 Total In-Court Time: 00:49 To order a transcript of this proceeding, contact Avery Wood Reports (303) 825-6119 or Toll Free 1-800-962-3345. Page 3 of 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?