Stransky et al v. HealthONE of Denver, LLC et al
Filing
330
ORDER granting 327 Joint Motion to Revise the Court's Approval Order, by Judge William J. Martinez on 11/24/2015.(cthom, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-2888-WJM-MJW
LISA STRANSKY,
NATALIE FIORE,
ERIN PEREZ,
HELEN GEIST,
ANGELA VANLENGEN,
BROOKE THOMPSON,
MILDRED HAMILTON, and
NICOLE WAGNER,
individually and on behalf of others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HEALTHONE OF DENVER, INC.
Defendant.
and
Civil Action No. 14-cv-0042-WJM-MJW
MILDRED BROOKS,
HAYKE CAPERTON,
JASON CAPERTON,
JENNIFER CAYLOR,
ANGELA ELLIOTT,
CATHY GORDON,
MICHELLE LUGO, and
SALLY ANN WARDLE,
Plaintiffs,
v.
HEALTHONE OF DENVER, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE COURT’S APPROVAL ORDER
This Court, having received, reviewed and considered the Parties’ Joint Motion to
Revise the Court’s Approval Order (ECF No. 326), hereby ORDERS as follows:
1.
The Joint Motion to Revise the Court’s Approval Order (ECF No. 327) is
GRANTED;
2.
The Court will revise the Approval Order so that it does not disclose the financial
details of the Settlement Agreement that were the subject of the Court’s order
restricting access to the Settlement Agreement and Plaintiffs’ Petition for
Reasonable Attorney’s Fees and Costs (ECF No. 314);
3.
The Clerk of Court shall replace the original Order Granting Joint Motion for
Approval of Settlement Agreement and Granting Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Petition for
Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees and Costs (ECF No. 326) with the Court’s Amended
Approval Order, which shall be docketed unrestricted; and
4.
Notwithstanding the revisions to the Approval Order, all other aspects of the
Court’s Approval Order, including its original issuance date of November 10, 2015,
shall remain the same.
Dated this 24th day of November, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
_________________________
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?