Finnegan v. United States of America

Filing 16

ORDER OF DISMISSAL (This Order Relates to Civil Action No. 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB). The Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice [# 254 ] is APPROVED. Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE with each party to bear its own costs. Any pending motion filed in Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB is DENIED as moot. Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB SHALL NOT APPEAR in the caption of this case. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 4/22/2013. (klyon, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Case No. 10-cv-03050-REB-BNB (Consolidated with Civil Action Nos. 10-cv-03051-REB-BNB, 11-cv-01832-REB-BNB, 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB, 11-cv-02895-REB-BNB, 11-cv-03069-REB-BNB, and 11-cv03070-REB-BNB) REGINA RESSLER, and RANDY RESSLER, Plaintiffs, v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. ORDER OF DISMISSAL (This Order Relates to Civil Action No. 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB) Blackburn, J. The matter is before me on the Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice [#254]1 filed April 22, 2013. After reviewing the stipulation and the record, I conclude that the stipulation should be approved and that Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB should be dismissed with prejudice. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Stipulation To Dismiss With Prejudice [#254] filed April 22, 2013, is APPROVED; 2. That Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE 1 “[#254]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. with each party to bear its own costs; 3. That any pending motion filed in Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB is DENIED as moot; and 4. That Civil Action 11-cv-02894-REB-BNB SHALL NOT APPEAR in the caption of this case. Dated April 22, 2013, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?