Jones v. GEO Group, Inc., The
Filing
32
ORDER denying as moot 23 Motion To Stay Summary Judgment Briefing Deadlines. By Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 11/30/12. (kfinn, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge Robert E. Blackburn
Civil Case No. 11-cv-02961-REB-MJW
JOHN JONES,
Plaintiff,
v.
THE GEO GROUP, INC.,
Defendant.
ORDER
Blackburn, J.
The matter before me is plaintiff’s Motion To Stay Summary Judgment
Briefing Deadlines [#23],1 filed November 20, 2012. Plaintiff seeks to stay the
deadline for his response to defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [#20], filed
November 16, 2012, in light of his request for leave to amend his complaint to add
additional facts and claims to this lawsuit. (See Motion for Leave To Amend the
Complaint [#21], filed November 6, 2012.) The magistrate judge denied that motion.
(See Order on Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave To Amend the Complaint (Docket No.
21) [#30], filed November 29, 2012.) The motion to stay therefore is moot, and I deny it
on that basis.2
1
“[#23]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a
specific paper by the court’s electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this
convention throughout this order.
2
As provided in my Minute Order [#27], filed November 29, 2012, granting plaintiff’s Unopposed
Motion for Extension of Time To Respond to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment and
Request for Forthwith Determination [#26], filed November 28, 2012, the deadline for plaintiff to
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s Motion To Stay Summary
Judgment Briefing Deadlines [#23], filed November 20, 2012, is DENIED AS MOOT.
Dated November 30, 2012, at Denver, Colorado.
BY THE COURT:
respond to the motion for summary judgment is December 14, 2012. The deadline for any reply is
governed by D.C.COLO.LCivR 7.1C.
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?