Aman v. Dillon Companies, Inc.

Filing 97

ORDER Denying Request for Free Transcript 93 . ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24, ECF No. 93, is granted in part and denied in part. ORDERED that Mr. Aman may proceed on appeal without prepayment of fees or security therefor. ORDERED that Mr. Amans request for a free transcript is denied because the Court finds that this appeal does not present a substantial question. Mr. Aman may pay the estimated transcript fee in advance or make his own arrangements with the court reporter to pay for the cost of the transcript by Judge John L. Kane on 11/07/14. (jhawk, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-02973-JLK
MOE AMAN,
Plaintiff,
v.
DILLON COMPANIES, INC., A Kansas Corporation d/b/a KING SOOPERS,
Defendant.

ORDER
DENYING REQUEST FOR FREE TRANSCRIPT
Kane, Senior Judge
Plaintiff Moe Aman has submitted a Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on
Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24. The motion will be granted
in part and denied in part.
The Court has examined the file and finds that Mr. Aman has shown an inability to
pay the required filing fees and the existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the
law and facts in support of the issues raised on appeal. Therefore, Mr. Aman will be
allowed to proceed on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) without prepayment of fees
or security therefor.
However, the Court finds that this appeal does not present a substantial question,
i.e., a significant issue that is unique, unusual or reasonably debatable. Therefore,
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 753(f), Mr. Aman’s request for a free transcript will be denied.
Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion and Affidavit for Leave to Proceed on Appeal Pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 and Fed. R. App. P. 24, ECF No. 93, is granted in part and denied in
part. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Aman may proceed on appeal without prepayment
of fees or security therefor. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. Aman’s request for a free transcript is denied
because the Court finds that this appeal does not present a substantial question. Mr. Aman
may pay the estimated transcript fee in advance or make his own arrangements with the
court reporter to pay for the cost of the transcript.
DATED at Denver, Colorado this

7th

day of November, 2014.

BY THE COURT:
/s/John L. Kane
SENIOR U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE