Perez v. Douglas County Sheriff Dept. et al
Filing
13
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 12 Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion to Dismiss Case Without Prejudice. The Court GRANTS the Motion to the extent it seeks dismissal of the claims brought by Lina Gisela-Molina, German Jasso, and Laura Gutier rez. However, because Plaintiffs Gonzalo Perez and Julio Arreguin did not sign the Motion, the Court is not able to dismiss their claims at this time and as such the Motion is DENIED as to them. Accordingly, the action remains pending with respect to the claims asserted by Plaintiffs Gonzalo Perez and Julio Arreguin, by Judge William J. Martinez on 2/21/2012.(ervsl, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge William J. Martínez
Civil Action No. 11-cv-2975-WJM-KLM
GONZALO PEREZ, and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff,
v.
DOUGLAS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.,
GRAND COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.,
WINTER PARK - FRASER POLICE DEPT.,
DENVER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT.,
CITY OF DENVER POLICE DEPT.,
ADAMS COUNTY SHERIFF DEPT., and
AURORA POLICE DEPARTMENT,
Defendant.
_____________________________________________________________________
ORDER
_____________________________________________________________________
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion to Dismiss
Case Without Prejudice (“Motion” ECF No. 12) filed February 17, 2012. For the reasons
stated below, Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.
A Complaint commencing the instant action was filed November 16, 2011 (ECF
No. 1). The Complaint is brought by and on behalf of the following individuals: Gonzalo
Perez, Lina Gisel-Molina, German Jasso, Laura Gutierrez, and Julio Arreguin. The only
named Plaintiffs that have signed the Motion are Lina Gisela Molina, German Jasso,
and Laura Gutierrez. Because no defendant has appeared in this case, Plaintiffs are
entitled to dismiss the case without prejudice upon their Motion. Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(a).
However, because Plaintiffs are proceeding pro se, each individual Plaintiff must seek
dismissal of his or her own claims. See Meeker v. Kercher, 782 F. 2d 153, 154 (10th Cir
1986) (holding that non-attorney pro se litigants have the right to represent themselves
but do not have the ability to represent others).
Therefore, the Court GRANTS the Motion to the extent it seeks dismissal of the
claims brought by Lina Gisela-Molina, German Jasso, and Laura Gutierrez. However,
because Plaintiffs Gonzalo Perez and Julio Arreguin did not sign the Motion, the Court
is not able to dismiss their claims at this time and as such the Motion is DENIED as to
them. Accordingly, the action remains pending with respect to the claims asserted by
Plaintiffs Gonzalo Perez and Julio Arreguin.
The Clerk and the parties are directed to use a caption in all future filings in this
case which reflects Gonzalo Perez and Julio Arreguin as the only remaining PartiesPlaintiffs.
Dated this 21st day of February, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
______________________ _
William J. Martínez
United States District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?