Burke v. Alta Colleges, Inc.

Filing 110

MINUTE ORDER granting 107 Motion to Modify Scheduling Order for Good Cause to Extend Discovery Deadline to Allow Pre Filing Conference Concerning Plaintiff's Motion to Compel and for SanctionsPursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 for Withholding R elevant Evidence and Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6). Discovery due by 9/23/2013. Dispositive Motions due by 11/14/2013. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 2/20/2014. Final Pretrial Conference set for 2/27/2014 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix by Magistrate Judge Kristen L. Mix on 08/15/13.(jjhsl, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action Nos. 11-cv-02990-WYD-KLM 12-cv-02927-WYD-KLM SCOTT BURKE, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, and ANTONIO COOK, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ALTA COLLEGES, INC., d/b/a/ Westwood College, a Delaware corporation, Defendant. _____________________________________________________________________ MINUTE ORDER ______________________________________________________________________ ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Scott Burke’s1 Unopposed Motion to Modify Scheduling Order for Good Cause to Extend Discovery Deadline to Allow Pre Filing Conference Concerning Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and for Sanctions Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37 for Withholding Relevant Evidence and Plaintiff’s Motion for Sanctions for Failure to Comply with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30(b)(6) [Docket No. 107; Filed August 7, 2013] (the “Motion”). In the Motion, Plaintiff Scott Burke requests that the discovery deadline be extended to September 23, 2013 and that the dispositive motions deadline be extended to November 14, 2013. Motion [#107] at 1. In the Motion, Plaintiff Scott Burke notes that he seeks extensions of the deadlines “solely for the purpose of filing” a motion to compel and a motion for sanctions. Id. The Court also notes that the Final Pretrial Conference is set for November 18, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion [#107] is GRANTED in part. Parties must follow my procedures regarding discovery disputes, which do not permit the filing of motions to compel without permission. Hence, the discovery deadline is extended to allow the parties to follow my discovery dispute procedures only. The Scheduling Order entered on January 11, 2013 [#72] and amended on June 25, 2013 [#96], is further modified to extend the following deadlines: • 1 Discovery Deadline September 23, 2013 The Motion was filed only on behalf of Plaintiff Scott Burke. 1 • Dispositive Motions Deadline November 14, 2013 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Final Pretrial Conference set for November 18, 2013 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED and RESET to February 27, 2014 at 10:30 a.m. in Courtroom C-204, Second Floor, Byron G. Rogers United States Courthouse, 1929 Stout Street, Denver, Colorado. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the proposed pretrial order shall be submitted on or before February 20, 2014. The proposed pretrial order to be submitted to the Magistrate Judge under the ECF Procedures may be submitted in WordPerfect or pdf format and shall be emailed to the Magistrate Judge at Mix_Chambers@cod.uscourts.gov. Attorneys and/or pro se parties not participating in ECF shall submit their proposed pretrial order on paper to the Clerk’s Office. However, if any party in this case is participating in ECF, it is the responsibility of that party to submit the proposed pretrial order pursuant to the District of Colorado ECF Procedures. The parties shall prepare the proposed pretrial order in accordance with the form which may be downloaded from the Forms section of the court’s website at http://www.cod.uscourts.gov/Home.aspx. Dated: August 15, 2013 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?