Gatlin v. Holdridge et al

Filing 170

FINAL JUDGMENT. re: Order Adopting April 4, 2014 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, Granting Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 168 . Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants Chad Penner, Chris Durga, Ellen Haarmann, Jack Chapman, Jessica Jaramillo, Larry Cox, Paul Dose, Steve Brown, Jr, Steve Brown, Sr. and against Plaintiff Antwan Ocie Gatlin, by Deborah A. Hansen, Deputy Clerk, on 5/7/2014. (dhans, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge William J. Martínez Civil Action No. 11-cv-03004-WJM-KLM ANTWAN OCIE GATLIN, Plaintiff, v. STEVE BROWN, SR., Investigator, JESSICA JARAMILLO, Correctional Officer, STEVE BROWN, JR., Assistant Warden, CHAD PENNER, Case Manager, CHRIS DURGA, Correctional Officer, PAUL DOSE, Shift Supervisor, LARRY COX, Chief of Security, JACK CHAPMAN, Hearings Disciplinary Officer, and ELLEN HAARMANN, Correctional Counselor, Defendants. FINAL JUDGMENT Pursuant to and in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a), all previous Orders entered during the pendency of this case, and the Order Adopting April 4, 2014 Recommendation of Magistrate Judge, Granting Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, entered by the Honorable William J. Martínez, United States District Judge, on May 7, 2014, IT IS ORDERED that (1) The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (ECF No. 167) is ADOPTED in its entirety; (2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 153) is GRANTED; (3) Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding the December 16, 2010 incident is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and (4) Final Judgment is entered in favor of Defendants and against Plaintiff with respect to Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claim regarding the February 9, 2010 incident. The parties shall bear their own costs. Dated at Denver, Colorado, this 7th day of May 2014. BY THE COURT: JEFFREY P. COLWELL, CLERK By: s/Deborah A. Hansen Deborah A. Hansen, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?