Sherman v. Klenke et al

Filing 121

COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer: Motion Hearing held on 8/15/2013. For the reasons stated on the record, 102 Plaintiff's Motion for Waiver of Certificate of Review Requirements is DENIED. Within 7 calendar days from todays date, counsel shall file a supplemental brief that updates the factual basis of the 115 Motion to Quash and notices the court if Defendants would like to substantially narrow, withdraw, or stand on the Motion. Plaintiff shall have 7 days to respond from the date the Motion is received. FTR: Courtroom A402 - C. Covington. (ccovi)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Craig B. Shaffer Civil Action: 11-cv-03091-REB-CBS Date: August 15, 2013 FTR - Reporter Deck - Courtroom A402 Courtroom Deputy: Courtni Covington Parties: Counsel: MATTHEW RYAN SHERMAN, Pro Se (appearing by telephone) Plaintiff, v. WILLIAM KLENKE, et al., Jennifer S. Huss Defendants. COURTROOM MINUTES/MINUTE ORDER HEARING: MOTION HEARING Court in session: 10:02 a.m. Court calls case. Appearances of counsel and pro se Plaintiff. The court addresses the parties regarding Plaintiff’s MOTION for Waiver of Certificate of Review Requirement [Doc. No. 102, filed 5/20/2013]. The court notes the Motion has been fully briefed but no counsel appear for Defendants Correctional Health Partners. Plaintiff states he does not feel oral argument is needed. Discussion regarding the certificate of review issue and relevant case law. The court states it will treat the Motion as a non-dispositive Motion for Reconsideration. ORDERED: For the reasons stated on the record, Plaintiff’s MOTION for Waiver of Certificate of Review Requirement [Doc. No. 102, filed 5/20/2013] is DENIED. The court clarifies that it is ruling from the bench and Plaintiff has 14 days from today’s date to file an objection. The court moves next to Defendants’ MOTION to Quash in Part [Doc. No. 115, filed 7/29/2013]. Discussion between the court and Ms. Huss regarding Defendants’ partial objection to the subpoenas. Counsel states that a restricted version of the Clinical Standards is being withheld for security reasons. Defense counsel provides a copy for in camera review and engages in discussion with the court regarding if the entire document poses a security risk. The court suggests counsel further consult with the Colorado Department of Corrections to determine what portions can be produced. Discussion between the court and Ms. Huss regarding Plaintiff’s request for grievances and how the Colorado Department of Corrections can search those grievances. Discussion between the court and Mr. Sherman regarding his response to the Motion to Quash and the burden being placed on a non-party to conduct a manual search of grievances related to Defendants Klenke and Montoya. ORDERED: Within 7 calendar days from today’s date, Ms. Huss shall file a supplemental brief that updates the factual basis of the Motion to Quash and notices the court if Defendants would like to substantially narrow, withdraw, or stand on the Motion. Plaintiff shall have 7 days to respond from the date the Motion is received. The court addresses Mr. Sherman regarding its concern that his subpoena requests are too broad. Discussion between the court and the parties regarding expanding the subpoena to include Defendant Klenke’s contractor as a party to be searched. The court states without Plaintiff providing a name of the contractor, the court cannot modify the subpoena in the absence of that information. The court addresses the parties regarding the discovery deadline currently set, the amount and type of discovery that has been completed, and whether the parties anticipate the use of experts. Both parties believe they will finish discovery by the cut-off date. HEARING CONCLUDED. Court in recess: 10:52 a.m. Total time in court: 00:50 To order transcripts of hearings with Magistrate Judge Shaffer, please contact Avery Woods Reporting at (303) 825-6119 or toll free at 1-800-962-3345.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?