Truelove v. Astrue

Filing 9

Joint Case Management Plan for Social Security Cases (ORDER) SS Plaintiffs Brief due by 5/16/2012. SS Defendants Brief due by 6/15/2012. SS Plaintiffs Reply Brief due by 6/30/2012, by Judge John L. Kane on 4/10/12. (gmssl, )

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03114-AP
BETTY A. TRUELOVE,
Plaintiff,
v.
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.

JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR SOCIAL SECURITY CASES

1.

APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE PARTIES

For Plaintiff:
Michael Desaulniers, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
[e-mail]

For Defendant:
John F. Walsh
United States Attorney
William G. Pharo
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

2.

STATEMENT OF LEGAL BASIS FOR SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction based on section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42
U.S.C. ' 405(g).

3.

DATES OF FILING OF RELEVANT PLEADINGS
A.
B.
C.

4.

Date Complaint was filed:
November 30, 2011
Date Complaint was served on U.S. Attorney’s Office: January 26, 2012
Date Answer and Administrative Record were filed: March 26, 2012

STATEMENT REGARDING THE ADEQUACY OF THE RECORD
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, state that the administrative record is
complete and accurate.

5.

STATEMENT REGARDING ADDITIONAL EVIDENCE
Neither party intends to submit additional evidence.

6.

STATEMENT REGARDING WHETHER THIS CASES RAISES UNUSUAL
CLAIMS OR DEFENSES
The parties, to the best of their knowledge, do not believe the case raises unusual
claims or defenses.

7.

OTHER MATTERS
The parties have no other matters to bring to the attention of the Court.

8.

BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Because of workload and scheduling conflicts, the parties respectfully request
briefing to commence later than 40 days after the filing of this Joint Case
Management plan, as follows
A.
B.
C.

9.

Plaintiff’s opening brief due
Defendant’s response brief due
Plaintiff’s reply brief (if any) due

STATEMENTS REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT
2

May 16, 2012
June 15, 2012
June 30, 2012

A.
B.
10.

Plaintiff does not request oral argument.
Defendant does not request oral argument.

CONSENT TO EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE
All parties have not consented to the exercise of jurisdiction of a United States
Magistrate Judge.

11.

OTHER MATTERS
THE PARTIES FILING MOTIONS FOR EXTENSION OF TIME OR
CONTINUANCES MUST COMPLY WITH D.C. COLO.L.CivR. 7.1(C) BY
SUBMITTING PRROF THAT A COPY OF THE MOTION HAS BEEN
SERVED UPON ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD AND ALL PRO SE
PARTIES.

12.

AMENDMENTS TO JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN
The parties agree that the Joint Case Management Plan may be altered or amended
only upon a showing of good cause.
DATED this 10th day of April, 2012.
BY THE COURT:

S/John L. Kane
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

3

APPROVED:
s/Michael A. Desaulniers
Michael Desaulniers, Esq.
402 W. 12th Street
Pueblo, Colorado 81003
719-543-8636
[e-mail]

JOHN F. WALSH
United States Attorney
WILLIAM G. PHARO
Assistant United States Attorney
District of Colorado
s/Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Stephanie Lynn F. Kiley
Special Assistant United States Attorney
Office of the General Counsel
Social Security Administration
1001 Seventeenth Street, 6th Floor
Denver, Colorado 80202
[phone]
[e-mail]

4