Dowling v. Xcel Energy

Filing 31

MINUTE ORDER denying without prejudice 29 Plaintiff's Motion to Join Parties, by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 4/17/2012. (mehcd)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH
THERESA L. DOWLING,
Plaintiff,
v.
XCEL ENERGY,
Defendant.

MINUTE ORDER
Entered by Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge, on April 17, 2012.
Plaintiff’s Motion to Join Parties [filed April 13, 2012; docket #29] is denied without
prejudice for failure to comply with D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A. The Court reminds the parties that
it “will not consider any motion, other than a motion under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 or 56, unless counsel
for the moving party or a pro se party, before filing the motion, has conferred or made reasonable,
good-faith efforts to confer with opposing counsel. ” D.C. Colo. LCivR 7.1A (emphasis added).
It is the responsibility of the moving party to “state in the motion, or in a certificate attached to the
motion, the specific efforts to comply with this rule...” Id.