Dowling v. Xcel Energy
Filing
38
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 5/2/2012. (mehcd)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03173-REB-MEH
THERESA L. DOWLING,
Plaintiff,
v.
XCEL ENERGY,
Defendant.
PROTECTIVE ORDER
Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.
Upon a showing of good cause in support of the entry of a blanket protective order to protect
the discovery and dissemination of confidential information or information which will improperly
annoy, embarrass, or oppress any party, witness, or person providing discovery in this case, IT IS
HEREBY ORDERED:
1.
This Protective Order shall apply to all documents, materials, and information,
including without limitation, documents produced, answers to interrogatories, responses to requests
for admission, deposition testimony, and other information disclosed pursuant to the disclosure or
discovery duties created by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and designated and marked as
"CONFIDENTIAL" pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order.
2.
As used in this Protective Order, the term "document" shall include, without
limitation, any electronic or hard copy emails, writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs,
phone records, and other data compilations from which information can be obtained. See Fed. R.
Civ. P. 34(a). A draft or non-identical copy is a separate document within the meaning of this term.
3.
Information designated "CONFIDENTIAL" shall be information that is confidential
and implicates common law or statutory privacy interests of current or former employees (including
Plaintiff), representatives, or agents of Defendant, Public Service Company of Colorado, doing
business as Xcel Energy (improperly identified in the Complaint as "Xcel Energy") ("PSCo" or
"Defendant"), or any of the subsidiaries or affiliates of Defendant, including but not limited to:
personnel information concerning current and former employees of Defendant or Defendant's
contractor's employees; information concerning private personal matters not generally known to the
public, such as, but not limited to, tax returns and medical information; non-party employee
addresses, social security numbers; non-parties' employment and compensation histories; non-party
employee performance evaluations and termination files; information containing industry or
Defendant's trade secrets information; Defendant's proprietary or non-public business information,
including Defendant's business contracts; information relating to Defendant's confidential, internal
investigations; information relating to Defendant's investment, business and operational strategies,
plans and corporate structure, economic and market analyses, marketing strategies, client/project
lists, financial projections and cost information treated or considered by Defendant, by policy or
practice, to be confidential or proprietary. CONFIDENTIAL information shall not be disclosed or
used for any purpose except in the preparation and trial of this case (including any appeal) in
accordance with this Protective Order.
4.
CONFIDENTIAL documents, materials, and/or information (collectively
"CONFIDENTIAL information") shall not, without the consent of the party producing it and the
consent of the party claiming confidentiality (if that party is different from the producing party) or
further Order of the Court, be disclosed or made available in any way to any person other than:
(a)
attorneys actively working on this case;
(b)
persons regularly employed or associated with the attorneys actively working
2
on the case whose assistance is required by said attorneys in the preparation for trial, at trial, or at
other proceedings in this case;
(c)
the parties, including designated representatives for Defendant;
(d)
expert witnesses and consultants retained in connection with this proceeding,
to the extent such disclosure is necessary for depositions, preparation, trial or other proceedings in
this case;
(e)
the Court and its employees ("Court Personnel");
(f)
stenographic reporters who are engaged in proceedings necessarily incident
to the conduct of this action;
(g)
witnesses in the course of deposition or trial testimony where counsel has a
reasonable and good faith belief that examination with respect to the document is necessary in
legitimate discovery or trial purposes in this case, and any person who is being prepared to testify
where counsel has a reasonable and good faith belief that such person will be a witness in this action
and that his examination with respect to the document is necessary in connection with such
testimony; and
(h)
5.
other persons by written agreement of all the parties.
Prior to disclosing any CONFIDENTIAL information to any person listed above
(other than the individuals listed in paragraphs 4(a) through 4(f)), Defendant's counsel or Plaintiff
shall provide such person with a copy of this Protective Order and obtain from such person a written
acknowledgment (in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A) stating that he or she has read this
Protective Order and agrees to be bound by its provisions. All such acknowledgments shall be
retained by Defendant's counsel or Plaintiff and shall be subject to in camera review by the Court
if good cause for review is demonstrated by either party.
3
6.
Documents are designated as CONFIDENTIAL by placing or affixing on them (in
a manner that will not interfere with their legibility) the following or other appropriate notice:
"CONFIDENTIAL." Any information designated by a party as CONFIDENTIAL must first be
reviewed by either the Defendant's attorney or the Plaintiff, who will certify that the designation as
CONFIDENTIAL is based on a good faith belief that the information is CONFIDENTIAL or
otherwise implicates common law or statutory privacy interests.
7.
Whenever a deposition involves the disclosure of CONFIDENTIAL information, the
deposition or portions thereof shall be designated as CONFIDENTIAL and shall be subject to the
provisions of this Protective Order. Such designation shall be made on the record during the
deposition whenever possible, but a party may designate portions of depositions as
CONFIDENTIAL after transcription, provided written notice of the designation is promptly given
to Defendant's counsel or the Plaintiff within thirty (30) days after notice by the court reporter of the
completion of the transcript.
8.
Production of any document or materials without a designation of confidentiality or
an incorrect designation will not be deemed to waive a later claim as to its proper designation nor
will it prevent the producing party from designating said documents or material "CONFIDENTIAL"
at a later date.
9.
In the event that a non-party or another party produces documents that a party wishes
in good faith to designate as CONFIDENTIAL, the party wishing to make that designation must do
so within fifteen (15) business days of receipt, and identify the CONFIDENTIAL document(s) or
CONFIDENTIAL information by bates label or, where not bates labeled, by document title and page
number(s). The non-designating parties shall thereafter mark the document or information in the
manner requested by the designating party and thereafter treat the document or information in
4
accordance with such marking. However, any use by the non-designating parties made before a
post-production designation will not be a violation of this Protective Order, and the post-production
designation will apply prospectively only and will not apply to any disclosure made prior to the
designation, so long at the non-designating party notifies the designating party of the prior disclosure
and otherwise comes into conformance with the new designation.
10.
A party may object to the designation of particular CONFIDENTIAL information
by giving written notice to the party designating the disputed information. The written notice shall
identify the information to which the objection is made. If the parties cannot resolve the objection
within ten (10) business days after the time the notice is received, it shall be the obligation of the
party designating the information as CONFIDENTIAL to file an appropriate motion within thirty
(30) days after the conclusion of that 10-business day window requesting that the Court determine
whether the disputed information should be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. If such a
motion is not timely filed, the disputed information shall not be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under
the terms of this Protective Order. If a motion is timely filed, the disputed information shall be
treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Protective Order until the Court rules on the
motion. In connection with a motion filed under this provision, the party designating the
information as CONFIDENTIAL shall bear the burden of establishing that good cause exists for the
disputed information to be treated as CONFIDENTIAL.
11.
In the event it is necessary for either party to file CONFIDENTIAL information with
the Court, the party wishing to file such CONFIDENTIAL information shall file in accordance with
the requirements of D.C.COLO.L.CivR 7.2, with an accompanying Motion to Restrict Access and
a designation of the level of restriction sought.
12.
At the conclusion of this case, and any appeal, each document, all copies and
5
electronic copies thereof, which have been designated as CONFIDENTIAL shall be returned to the
party that designated it CONFIDENTIAL. The returning party shall provide the other party with
a written certification confirming that all CONFIDENTIAL documents and electronic copies have
been returned.
13.
The terms of this Protective Order shall survive the termination of this action and all
protections of this Protective Order shall remain in full effect in perpetuity.
14.
This Protective Order may be modified by the Court at any time for good cause
shown following notice to all parties and an opportunity for them to be heard.
Dated and entered at Denver, Colorado, this 2nd day of May, 2012.
BY THE COURT:
Michael E. Hegarty
United States Magistrate Judge
6
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?