Niederquell et al v. Bank of America N.A. et al

Filing 49

MINUTE ORDER granting #44 Plaintiffs' Motion for Protective Order Re: Location of Deposition. By Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe on 11/2/2012.(mjwcd)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Magistrate Judge Michael J. Watanabe Civil Action No. 11-cv-03185-MSK-MJW MARK D. NIEDERQUELL, and JUDITH A. NIEDERQUELL, Plaintiffs, v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. and THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON f/k/a THE BANK OF NEW YORK as trustee for the CERTIFICATEHOLDERS OF CWABS, INC., ASSET-BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-3, Defendants. MINUTE ORDER It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ Motion for Protective Order Re: Location of Deposition (docket no. 44) is GRANTED finding good cause shown. The depositions of Plaintiffs Mark D. Niederquell and Judith A. Niederquell shall take place in either South Fork or Alamosa, Colorado. The parties are to meet and confer consistent with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 and D.C.COLO.LCivR 30.1 and set these depositions. Plaintiffs filed this lawsuit in the Rio Grande County District Court, Colorado. The Defendants could have defended this case in the Rio Grande County District Court. Instead, the Defendants made a strategic decision to remove this case to federal district court. By removing this case to the federal district court, the Defendants have created a time and financial hardship for Plaintiffs having to drive to Denver, Colorado to prosecute their case. Plaintiffs did not choose the federal district court as the forum in which to prosecute their lawsuit. Accordingly, in the interest of justice and equity, the subject motion should be granted. Date: November 2, 2012

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?