Hermann v. Hartford Casualty Insurance Company

Filing 98

ORDER granting 97 Joint Motion To Reopen Civil Action by Judge Robert E. Blackburn on 3/4/15.(dkals, )

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Judge Robert E. Blackburn Civil Action No. 11-cv-03188-REB-MEH JOHN HERMANN, Plaintiff, v. HARTFORD CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. ORDER LIFTING ADMINISTRATIVE CLOSURE Blackburn, J. This matter is before me on the Joint Motion To Reopen Civil Action [#97]1 filed March 3, 2015. I grant the motion. This case was closed administratively pending the resolution of certain issues in a parallel bankruptcy proceeding. Those issues have been resolved by the bankruptcy court, and the issues in this case now are ripe for resolution. These circumstances constitute good cause to reopen this case. Under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, administrative closure of a case terminates all pending motions. Re-opening of the case does not reinstate such motions. THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED as follows: 1. That the Joint Motion To Reopen Civil Action [#97] filed March 3, 2015, is GRANTED; 1 “[#97]” is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court’s case management and electronic case filing system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order. 2. That under D.C.COLO.LCivR 41.2, the clerk is DIRECTED to reopen this civil action; and 3. That the Honorable Michael E. Hegarty, the United States Magistrate Judge assigned to this case, SHALL CONDUCT a scheduling conference and enter an appropriate scheduling order.2 Dated March 4, 2015, at Denver, Colorado. BY THE COURT: 2 This second scheduling conference and concomitant scheduling order shall supplant and supersede the initial scheduling conference and order of January 27, 2012, see [#12] and [#13]. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?