Jakubauskas v. Ecolab, Inc.
Filing
52
MINUTE ENTRY for Hearing on Attorney's Fees held before Judge R. Brooke Jackson on May 9, 2013: ORDERED: The Application for Attorney's Fees on Ecolab Inc.'s Rule 26(g)(3)And 37(c)(1)(A) Motion for Costs and Attorney's Fees Cause d by Plaintiff's Improper Certification 44 is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. ORDERED: The Court awards the amount of $5,891.00 in attorney's fees. Judgment Awarding Attorney's Fees shall enter in favor of defendant and against the plaintiff. Hearing concluded. Court Reporter: Kara Spitler. (wjmcd, )
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Judge R. Brooke Jackson
_____________________________________________________________________
Courtroom Deputy: Deborah Hansen
Court Reporter: Kara Spitler
Date: May 9, 2013
_____________________________________________________________________
Civil Action No. 11-cv-03222-RBJ
Counsel:
CHRIS JAKUBAUSKAS,
Christopher Gilbert
Plaintiff,
v.
ECOLAB, INC.,
Jordan Lipp
Defendant.
__________________________________________________________________
COURTROOM MINUTES
________________________________________________________________________
HEARING ON ATTORNEY’S FEES
08:30 a.m.
Court in Session
Appearances
Court’s comments
Neither party has evidence to present.
Argument by Mr. Lipp
Argument by Mr. Gilbert
Plaintiff does not contest the reasonableness or necessity of the fees requested
($5,891.00).
Court’s findings entered on the record.
ORDERED: The Application for Attorney’s Fees on Ecolab Inc.’s Rule 26(g)(3)
And 37(c)(1)(A) Motion for Costs and Attorney’s Fees Caused by
Plaintiff’s Improper Certification [44] is GRANTED IN PART AND
DENIED IN PART.
ORDERED: The Court awards the amount of $5,891.00 in attorney’s fees.
Judgment Awarding Attorney’s Fees shall enter in favor of defendant
and against the plaintiff.
08:50 a.m.
Court in Recess
Hearing concluded
Time: 20 minutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?